Jesus Manuel Farias v. The State of Texas

No. 13-25-00618-CR (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi–Edinburg Feb. 5, 2026) · Texas Court of Appeals, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi–Edinburg · February 5, 2026 · No. 13-25-00618-CR

Summary

The Thirteenth Court of Appeals of Texas dismissed Jesus Manuel Farias’s attempted appeal from a judgment of conviction for want of jurisdiction. The court relied on the trial court’s certification that Farias knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal and counsel’s failure to show that he had a right of appeal.

Court
Texas Court of Appeals, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi–Edinburg
Writing for the Court
Jon West; Chief Justice Tijerina; Justice Peña; Justice West
Jurisdiction
Texas Court of Appeals, Thirteenth District
Decision date
February 5, 2026
Docket number
13-25-00618-CR
Procedural posture
Appellant filed a notice of appeal from a judgment of conviction. The court of appeals, on its own motion, dismissed the appeal for want of jurisdiction because the trial court's certification stated that appellant had voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently waived his right to appeal, and counsel did not demonstrate otherwise.
Precedential value
Unpublished memorandum opinion; designated not to be published under Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Parties
Jesus Manuel Farias v. The State of Texas
Disposition
dismissed

Topics

appellate jurisdictionappellate procedurecriminal procedure

Practice areas

criminal appellate procedurecriminal procedure

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the court of appeals had jurisdiction to review the judgment of conviction when the trial court's certification stated that appellant waived his right to appeal and the record did not show otherwise.

Holdings

  1. An appeal must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction when the trial court's certification does not show that the defendant has a right of appeal, and the record does not otherwise establish such a right.

Key quotations

voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently waive[d] [his] right to appeal. (at 1)

Factual background

Appellant sought to appeal a judgment of conviction. The trial court certified that appellant had voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently waived his right to appeal. After the court of appeals directed appellant's counsel to determine whether appellant nevertheless had a right to appeal, counsel failed to respond or provide support for appellate jurisdiction.

Procedural history

The 370th District Court of Hidalgo County entered a judgment of conviction in trial court cause number CR-1949-25-G. Appellant filed a notice of appeal on November 18, 2025. The court of appeals ordered appellant's counsel to review the record and determine whether appellant had a right to appeal, but counsel did not respond or otherwise establish appellate jurisdiction.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…