United States v. Jose Soto

Soto · United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · December 6, 2024 · No. 23-1827

Summary

This document is a per curiam order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit amending a previously filed opinion in a criminal appeal. The court corrected a clerical formatting error by removing bolded text from the citations within the original opinion. The order clarifies that the original filing date of both the opinion and the judgment remains unaltered.

Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Writing for the Court
Theodore A. McKee; Restrepo; Matey; McKee
Jurisdiction
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decision date
December 6, 2024
Docket number
23-1827
Procedural posture
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey; the Court of Appeals issued an order amending its previously filed opinion to remove bolded citation text.
Precedential value
Published
Parties
Jose Soto v. United States of America
Disposition
other

Topics

appellate procedurecriminal procedure

Practice areas

appellate procedurecriminal procedure

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the previously filed appellate opinion should be amended to remove citations that appeared as bolded text.

Key quotations

As this amendment is clerical in nature, the original filed date of the opinion and the judgment shall not be altered.

Factual background

The document concerns a clerical amendment to a previously filed appellate opinion. The court stated that citations in the opinion had appeared as bolded text and ordered that the bolding be removed.

Procedural history

Jose Soto appealed from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey in criminal case No. 2-20-00903-002. The Third Circuit amended its opinion for clerical reasons by removing citations that had appeared as bolded text, without altering the original filing date of the opinion or judgment.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…