Summary
The Third District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed the circuit court’s confirmation of an arbitration award in an employment-related dispute. The court relied on the absence of a timely challenge to the award, the presumption that a person signing a contract knows its contents, and the waiver of issues raised for the first time in a reply brief or not raised in the initial brief.
Holdings
- The circuit court properly confirmed the arbitration award because no timely challenge, basis to vacate, modify, or correct the award, or viable issue outside the scope of arbitration was presented.
- Issues raised for the first time in a reply brief or not raised in the initial brief are waived or abandoned and will not be considered.
Questions Presented
- Whether the circuit court properly confirmed the arbitration award.
- Whether issues raised for the first time in the reply brief or omitted from the initial brief could be considered on appeal.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (7)
- Zahav Refi LLC v. White Hawk Asset Mgmt., Inc., 395 So. 3d 556, 559 (Fla. 2d DCA 2024)(followed)
- Hinshaw v. Wachovia Bank, N.A., 935 So. 2d 86, 86-87 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)(followed)
- Kendall Imps., LLC v. Diaz, 215 So. 3d 95, 101 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017)(applied)
- Rivero v. Rivero, 963 So. 2d 934, 938 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007)(followed)
- Raffay v. Longwood House Condo. Ass'n, Inc., 389 So. 3d 589, 593 (Fla. 3d DCA 2023)(followed)
- State v. City of Weston, 316 So. 3d 398, 408 (Fla. 1st DCA 2021)(followed)
- Rosier v. State, 276 So. 3d 403, 406 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…