Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe · United States District Court, District of Massachusetts · July 9, 2025 · No. 1:25-cv-11555

Summary

This United States District Court order grants plaintiff Strike 3 Holdings, LLC’s motion for leave to serve a third-party subpoena on Comcast Cable prior to the Rule 26(f) conference. The court finds good cause to permit early discovery to identify an anonymous defendant in a copyright infringement action. The order establishes specific procedures and deadlines for the ISP to notify the subscriber, who may contest the subpoena within thirty days before any personal information is released.

Court
United States District Court, District of Massachusetts
Writing for the Court
F. Dennis Saylor IV
Jurisdiction
District of Massachusetts
Decision date
July 9, 2025
Docket number
1:25-cv-11555
Procedural posture
Plaintiff's motion for leave to serve a third‑party subpoena before a Rule 26(f) conference
Precedential value
nonprecedential
Disposition
approved

Topics

discovery disputecivil procedure

Practice areas

civil procedureintellectual property

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the plaintiff demonstrated good cause to obtain a third‑party subpoena before the Rule 26(f) conference.

Holdings

  1. The motion is granted, allowing the plaintiff to serve a third‑party subpoena on the ISP subject to the listed restrictions.

Key quotations

Strike 3 may immediately serve a third‑party subpoena, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45, upon Comcast Cable, requiring that it disclose only the name and address of the subscriber associated with IP address 98.229.82.197.

Factual background

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC, a producer of adult films, alleges that John Doe, an unknown subscriber identified only by IP address 98.229.82.197, downloaded and distributed its films without authorization. The plaintiff seeks the subscriber's name and address to effect service of process.

Procedural history

Plaintiff filed a copyright infringement action and moved for early discovery via a third‑party subpoena; the district court considered the motion and issued an order.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…