Morales v. Minev

Morales v. Minev · United States District Court, District of Nevada · March 31, 2025 · No. 2:22-cv-00387-RFB-EJY

Summary

This document is a joint stipulation and proposed order filed by the parties in a federal civil lawsuit seeking an extension of the discovery deadline until December 26, 2025. The parties cite the plaintiff's recent health issues, including neurological problems and open-heart surgery, as grounds for good cause and excusable neglect. The magistrate judge granted the request, setting new dates for expert disclosures and pre-trial filings while noting that no further extensions will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances.

Court
United States District Court, District of Nevada
Decision date
March 31, 2025
Docket number
2:22-cv-00387-RFB-EJY
Procedural posture
Stipulation and Proposed Order to Extend Discovery
Precedential value
nonprecedential
Disposition
approved

Topics

discovery disputecivil procedure

Practice areas

civil procedure

Questions Presented

  1. Whether good cause and excusable neglect exist to justify extending the discovery deadline to December 26, 2025.

Holdings

  1. The court finds good cause and excusable neglect exist and orders that the discovery deadline be extended to December 26, 2025, with the stipulation that no further extensions will be granted absent extraordinary unforeseen circumstances.

Key quotations

IT IS SO ORDERED; provided, however, no further extensions of discovery will be granted absent extraordinary unforeseen circumstances.

Factual background

Plaintiff Sergio Morales, a prisoner, developed new neurological and cardiac health issues in early 2025, requiring additional expert testimony and review of medical records. The parties have been unable to meet the existing discovery deadline of March 31, 2025.

Procedural history

The parties have previously obtained two extensions of the discovery deadline. The plaintiff seeks a third extension due to new health issues and the need for additional expert discovery. The magistrate judge considered the parties' good cause and excusable neglect arguments.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…