Urban Elevation LLC v. Alexander

United States District Court, District of Nevada · January 7, 2025 · No. 2:24-cv-02262

Summary

This federal district court order adopts a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation to remand the case to state court. The court determined that the defendant’s notice of removal was untimely and failed to establish federal question jurisdiction under the well-pleaded complaint rule. Consequently, the court found a lack of subject matter jurisdiction, remanded the case to Clark County Justice Court, and denied the defendant’s application to proceed in forma pauperis.

Court
United States District Court, District of Nevada
Writing for the Court
Jennifer Dorsey
Jurisdiction
United States District Court, District of Nevada
Decision date
January 7, 2025
Docket number
2:24-cv-02262
Procedural posture
Magistrate judge issued a report and recommendation to remand the case for lack of subject‑matter jurisdiction; district judge adopted the recommendation and entered an order remanding the case.
Standard of review
de novo
Precedential value
unpublished
Disposition
remanded

Topics

subject matter jurisdictioncivil procedure

Practice areas

civil procedure

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the magistrate judge had authority to remand the case for lack of subject‑matter jurisdiction
  2. Whether removal was timely and proper under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1441 and 1446

Holdings

  1. A magistrate judge lacks authority to remand a case to state court when the issue is dispositive; such matters are subject to de novo review by the district judge.
  2. Removal was untimely; therefore the case lacks subject‑matter jurisdiction and must be remanded to state court.

Key quotations

The Ninth Circuit has held that remanding a case to state court, while not case‑dispositive, is dispositive of proceedings in federal court and is therefore beyond the authority of magistrate judges. (at 4)
Defendant’s notice of removal is untimely. Accordingly, the undersigned RECOMMENDS that this case be REMANDED to state court for lack of subject‑matter jurisdiction. (at 14‑15)

Factual background

Defendant Alexander removed an unlawful detainer action to federal court, alleging violations of 15 U.S.C. § 1692 and the Fair Credit Reporting Act. The removal was filed on December 6, 2024, after the state complaint was served on September 23, 2024, making the removal untimely. No federal question was presented in the complaint.

Procedural history

Defendant filed a removal of an unlawful detainer action to this Court. The magistrate judge issued a report and recommendation finding lack of subject‑matter jurisdiction and untimely removal. The district judge reviewed de novo and adopted the recommendation, remanding the case to state court.

Remand instructions

Remand back to the Justice Court, Township of Las Vegas, Clark County, Nevada, Case No. 24CO25654, Department 4, for lack of subject‑matter jurisdiction.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…