Vertical Computer Systems, Inc. v. Wolman

United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division · September 18, 2025 · No. 4:24-cv-00395

Summary

This memorandum opinion and order addresses Defendants' motion to dismiss or, alternatively, transfer venue to the Southern District of New York based on enforceable forum-selection clauses. The court analyzes the public interest factors under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) and concludes that extraordinary circumstances do not outweigh the controlling weight of the forum-selection clauses. Consequently, the court grants the motion in part and orders the case transferred to the Southern District of New York.

Court
United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Jurisdiction
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Decision date
September 18, 2025
Docket number
4:24-cv-00395
Procedural posture
Defendants' motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, to transfer venue was granted in part and the case was transferred to the Southern District of New York.
Precedential value
unpublished
Disposition
other

Topics

venueforum non convenienscivil procedure

Practice areas

civil procedurecommercial litigation

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the forum‑selection clauses in the contracts are enforceable.
  2. Whether extraordinary circumstances weigh against transfer under 28 U.S.C. §1404(a).
  3. Whether the case should be transferred to the Southern District of New York.

Holdings

  1. The forum‑selection clauses are enforceable because the plaintiffs did not allege fraud or overreach directed at the clauses themselves.
  2. No extraordinary circumstances weigh against transfer; therefore the case is transferred to the Southern District of New York.

Key quotations

The forum‑selection clauses are enforceable because Plaintiffs have not alleged that fraud or overreach was directed at the forum‑selection clauses themselves.

Factual background

Vertical Computer Systems, Inc. and NOW Solutions, Inc. allege that defendants Derek Wolman and the law firm Davidoff, Hutcher, and Citron used the companies as a conduit for racketeering and breached fiduciary duties, directing former CEO Richard Wade to further a pattern of corrupt transactions.

Procedural history

Plaintiffs filed a complaint on May 7, 2024 alleging fraudulent inducement, breach of fiduciary duty, conspiracy, and RICO claims. Defendants moved to dismiss for improper venue and res judicata, and alternatively moved to transfer venue under 28 U.S.C. §1404(a). The court considered the motion and granted it in part, ordering transfer.

Remand instructions

Transfer the case to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…