Stapleton v. Stebane

Stapleton v. Stebane · United States District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin · March 31, 2025 · No. 24-cv-1562-bhl

Summary

This screening order from the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin addresses a pro se prisoner’s complaint alleging Eighth Amendment violations by a correctional officer regarding his self-harm. The court grants the plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis after assessing his prison trust account and applies the deliberate indifference standard to allow his claim to proceed. The order also establishes procedures for service, responsive pleadings, filing fee collection, and mandatory electronic filing for inmate plaintiffs.

Court
United States District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin
Writing for the Court
Brett H. Ludwig
Jurisdiction
United States District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin
Decision date
March 31, 2025
Docket number
24-cv-1562-bhl
Procedural posture
Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and screening of a 42 U.S.C. §1983 complaint filed by a prisoner.
Precedential value
nonprecedential
Disposition
other

Topics

section 1983civil rightscivil procedureprisoners rightspleadings

Practice areas

civil rightscivil procedure

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the plaintiff may proceed in forma pauperis without prepaying the full filing fee
  2. Whether the plaintiff’s complaint satisfies the pleading requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 8 and states a plausible §1983 claim of deliberate indifference.

Holdings

  1. The court granted the motion, allowing the plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis while paying the balance of the filing fee over time.
  2. The court found the complaint sufficiently pleaded and allowed the plaintiff to proceed on a deliberate indifference claim against Officer Stebane.

Key quotations

“The pleading standard Rule 8 announces does not require ‘detailed factual allegations,’ but it demands more than an unadorned, the-defendant-unlawfully-harmed-me accusation.” (at 678)
“Prison officials violate the Eighth Amendment if they are aware of an objectively serious risk of harm to an inmate and knowingly or recklessly disregard it.” (at 846)

Factual background

In February 2024, inmate Justin Stapleton refused to give Officer Stebane his food tray, told the officer he was suicidal, and later cut himself, causing serious injuries. Stapleton alleges that Officer Stebane’s failure to intervene constituted deliberate indifference to a substantial risk of self‑harm.

Procedural history

Plaintiff filed a §1983 complaint while incarcerated and moved for leave to proceed without prepaying the filing fee. The district court considered the motion and the pleading standards and issued an order granting the motion and allowing the complaint to proceed.

Remand instructions

Officer Stebane must file a responsive pleading within sixty days of electronic notice; the custodial agency shall collect the remaining filing fee balance from the inmate’s trust account; discovery may not commence until a scheduling order is entered.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…