Gary S. Hann v. Christopher Compton

Hann v. Compton · United States District Court for the Central District of California · April 10, 2025 · No. ED CV 25-00165 FMO (SHKx)

Summary

The United States District Court for the Central District of California issued an order to show cause regarding dismissal for lack of prosecution. The court ordered the plaintiff to file proof of service or an answer by April 17, 2025, and warned that failure to respond could result in dismissal without prejudice.

Court
United States District Court for the Central District of California
Writing for the Court
Fernando M. Olguin
Jurisdiction
United States District Court for the Central District of California
Decision date
April 10, 2025
Docket number
ED CV 25-00165 FMO (SHKx)
Procedural posture
The court issued an order to show cause why the action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution based on the apparent failure to timely serve the defendants and obtain answers.
Standard of review
The court may dismiss an action sua sponte for lack of diligent prosecution under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), subject to the applicable service and response deadlines.
Precedential value
Nonprecedential district court order
Parties
Gary S. Hann v. Christopher Compton, et al.
Disposition
other

Topics

service of processcivil proceduremotions to dismiss

Practice areas

civil procedurelitigation

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the court should require plaintiff to show cause why the action should not be dismissed without prejudice for lack of prosecution based on the apparent failure to timely serve the defendants or obtain their answers.

Holdings

  1. Absent a showing of good cause, an action must be dismissed without prejudice if the summons and complaint are not served on a defendant within 90 days after the complaint is filed. The court may also dismiss before the 90-day period expires if the plaintiff has not diligently prosecuted the action.
  2. Generally, a defendant must answer within 21 days after service, or within 60 days if the defendant is the United States.

Key quotations

Absent a showing of good cause, an action must be dismissed without prejudice if the summons and complaint are not served on a defendant within 90 days after the complaint is filed.
The court may dismiss the action prior to the 90 days, however, if plaintiff(s) has/have not diligently prosecuted the action.

Factual background

The action had been filed, but the court observed that one or more applicable periods for service of the summons and complaint or for filing an answer appeared not to have been met. The court specifically required proof of service on all defendants and answers from all defendants, or a written showing of good cause, by April 17, 2025.

Procedural history

Plaintiff filed a civil action. The court determined that the record appeared not to show timely service of the summons and complaint or timely answers by the defendants, and sua sponte ordered plaintiff to show cause in writing by April 17, 2025, why the action should not be dismissed without prejudice for lack of prosecution.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…