Martin v. Phillips

United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · March 7, 2025 · No. 2:25-cv-00687-DJC-AC

Summary

This district court order grants a prisoner's motion for a temporary restraining order to transfer him back to prerelease custody after he was returned to prison due to an unresolved immigration detainer. The court concludes it has subject matter jurisdiction over the habeas petition, waives administrative exhaustion due to irreparable harm, and holds that the Bureau of Prisons violated the First Step Act by denying the petitioner's earned time credits based on his immigration status rather than a final order of removal.

Court
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California
Writing for the Court
Daniel Alabretta
Jurisdiction
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California
Decision date
March 7, 2025
Docket number
2:25-cv-00687-DJC-AC
Procedural posture
Petitioner Dumitru Martin filed a motion for a temporary restraining order seeking release to prerelease custody pending a habeas corpus petition; the court granted the TRO.
Precedential value
nonprecedential
Disposition
granted

Topics

post-conviction reliefstatutory interpretationsubject matter jurisdictioninjunctionscivil procedure

Practice areas

civil procedurecriminal procedureimmigration

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the district court has subject‑matter jurisdiction over the TRO because relief would lead to an earlier release from confinement.
  2. Whether 18 U.S.C. §3632(d)(4)(C) imposes a mandatory duty on the Bureau of Prisons to apply earned time credits to prerelease custody, thereby entitling Martin to such relief.
  3. Whether the exhaustion of administrative remedies requirement should be waived in this circumstance.

Holdings

  1. The court has subject‑matter jurisdiction over the petition because success on the claim would result in an earlier release from confinement, which falls within the core of habeas corpus.
  2. Section 3632(d)(4)(C) uses mandatory language (“shall”) and therefore requires the Bureau of Prisons to apply earned credits to prerelease custody or supervised release; the director may choose the form of custody but cannot deny the credit altogether.
  3. The court waives the exhaustion requirement because administrative remedies would be futile and the petitioner would suffer irreparable harm if denied relief.

Key quotations

For the foregoing reasons, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Petitioner’s Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (ECF No. 6) is GRANTED; A. Respondents are ordered to transfer Mr. Dumitru Martin back into prerelease custody. (at 12‑13)

Factual background

Martin was sentenced to 156 months, earned Good Conduct Time and First Step Act earned time credits, was transferred to home confinement, then arrested after an immigration detainer was discovered and returned to custody. He seeks release to prerelease custody.

Remand instructions

Respondents are ordered to transfer Martin back into prerelease custody and are enjoined from removing him based on his immigration status; the TRO expires March 21, 2025 unless further order.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…