Silva v. Jackson

Case No. 1:25-cv-00458-KES-EPG · United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · August 22, 2025 · No. 1:25-cv-00458-KES-EPG

Summary

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California construed Plaintiff Yolanda Silva’s filing as a notice of voluntary dismissal without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i). The court dismissed the § 1983 action without prejudice, denied the request for a filing-fee refund, terminated pending dates and deadlines, and closed the case.

Court
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California
Writing for the Court
Erica P. Grosjean
Jurisdiction
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California
Decision date
August 22, 2025
Docket number
1:25-cv-00458-KES-EPG
Procedural posture
Plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal before Defendant served an answer or motion for summary judgment. The court construed the filing as a notice of voluntary dismissal without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), declined to refund the filing fee, and closed the case.
Precedential value
unpublished, nonprecedential district court order
Parties
Yolanda Silva v. Nancy Jackson
Disposition
dismissed

Topics

civil proceduresection 1983prisoners rightsremedies

Practice areas

civil procedurecivil rightsprisoner litigationremedies

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Plaintiff could voluntarily dismiss the action without a court order under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i).
  2. Whether voluntary dismissal entitled Plaintiff to a refund of the filing fee.

Holdings

  1. A plaintiff may voluntarily dismiss an action without a court order by filing a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment. Because Defendant had served neither, Plaintiff's notice effected a dismissal without prejudice.
  2. Voluntary dismissal does not entitle a litigant, including a prisoner, to a refund of filing fees.

Key quotations

a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment. (at 1)
[V]oluntary dismissal of an action, whether filed by a prisoner or not, does not entitle the litigant to a refund of filing fees. (at 2)

Factual background

Yolanda Silva is incarcerated and proceeded pro se and in forma pauperis in an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. She filed a notice of voluntary dismissal stating that she wished to dismiss the case so she could properly exhaust her claims. At the time of dismissal, Defendant had not served an answer or motion for summary judgment.

Procedural history

Plaintiff, an incarcerated pro se litigant proceeding in forma pauperis under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, initiated the action and subsequently filed a notice of voluntary dismissal on August 14, 2025. Because no answer or motion for summary judgment had been served, the dismissal was effective without a court order. The court dismissed the action without prejudice, denied the request for a filing-fee refund, terminated pending dates and deadlines, and closed the case.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…