Paul Nicoletti v. Cherry Hill Commitment Treatment Center and Cherry Street Services, Inc.

No. 1:24-cv-12961 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 15, 2025) · United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Northern Division · October 15, 2025 · No. 1:24-cv-12961

Summary

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan dismissed Paul Nicoletti’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 as moot. The court held that Nicoletti’s release from Bureau of Prisons custody eliminated any possibility that habeas relief could shorten his custody, and that First Step Act time credits could not reduce his supervised-release term.

Court
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Northern Division
Writing for the Court
Thomas L. Ludington
Jurisdiction
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Northern Division
Decision date
October 15, 2025
Docket number
1:24-cv-12961
Procedural posture
Petitioner filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, claiming that the Bureau of Prisons failed to apply First Step Act time credits to release him to home confinement. While the petition was pending, he was released from prison and began serving supervised release.
Standard of review
The court applied Article III justiciability and mootness principles de novo as a threshold jurisdictional matter.
Precedential value
unpublished
Parties
Paul Nicoletti v. Cherry Hill Commitment Treatment Center, Cherry Street Services, Inc.
Disposition
dismissed

Topics

federal habeas corpuspost-conviction reliefsubject matter jurisdictionconstitutional lawequitable relief

Practice areas

federal habeas corpuspost-conviction reliefconstitutional lawcivil procedureremedies

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Nicoletti's § 2241 petition became moot after his release from Bureau of Prisons custody.
  2. Whether First Step Act time credits could provide effective relief after Nicoletti's release from prison and placement on supervised release.

Holdings

  1. A habeas petition is moot when the petitioner has been released and granting the requested relief would neither shorten the petitioner's custody nor produce any cognizable collateral consequence. Nicoletti's release from Bureau of Prisons custody mooted his petition.

Key quotations

Indeed, if issuing a writ of habeas corpus would neither shorten the petitioner’s custody nor yield any collateral consequences, then no live controversy remains for the court to resolve—the case is thus moot.
Because Petitioner has been released, habeas relief would not shorten his custody.
So Petitioner’s release from custody “makes it impossible for [this Court] to grant any effectual relief.”

Factual background

Nicoletti was serving a 70-month sentence followed by two years of supervised release after convictions for conspiring to commit bank fraud and aiding and abetting bank fraud. He filed a § 2241 petition alleging that the Bureau of Prisons refused to apply First Step Act time credits toward release to home confinement. During the pendency of the petition, he was released from prison and placed on supervised release.

Procedural history

Nicoletti filed the § 2241 petition on November 7, 2024. Before the district court resolved the petition, he was released from Bureau of Prisons custody. The court held that the requested relief could no longer shorten his custody or otherwise provide effective relief and dismissed the petition as moot, closing the case.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…