Vidal McDowell v. Pluto Acquisition OpCo, LLC

McDowell · United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division · October 27, 2025 · No. 23-cv-12827

Summary

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan granted final approval of a class action settlement in an action alleging violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act. The court found the settlement fair, reasonable, and adequate, approved the notice process and attorney’s fees, directed the parties to perform the settlement agreement, and released and enjoined the asserted claims.

Court
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division
Writing for the Court
Robert J. White
Jurisdiction
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division
Decision date
October 27, 2025
Docket number
23-cv-12827
Procedural posture
The parties jointly moved for final approval of a class action settlement following preliminary approval, class notice, discovery, and a final fairness hearing.
Standard of review
The Court evaluated the proposed settlement for fairness, reasonableness, and adequacy under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(e), applying the seven-factor framework identified by the Sixth Circuit.
Precedential value
Unpublished district court order; precedential status not indicated.
Disposition
approved

Topics

class actionsconsumer protectionequitable reliefinjunctionscivil procedure

Practice areas

class actionsconsumer protectioncivil procedurefair credit reportingequitable relief

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the proposed class action settlement was fair, reasonable, and adequate under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(e).
  2. Whether the class notice satisfied Rule 23(e), due process, and the best-practicable-notice standard.
  3. Whether the requirements of the Class Action Fairness Act were satisfied.

Holdings

  1. The settlement was fair, reasonable, and adequate and therefore warranted final approval under Rule 23(e).
  2. The class notice satisfied Rule 23(e), protected the due process rights of absent class members, and constituted the best practicable notice under the circumstances.
  3. The requirements of the Class Action Fairness Act were satisfied.

Key quotations

The Court finds the Settlement to be fair, reasonable and adequate as required by Rule 23(e), Fed. R. Civ. P. (¶ 2)
Plaintiff and the Settlement Classes hereby release all of the “Released Claims” as defined by Joint Stipulation of Class Settlement with prejudice and are barred and enjoined from pursuing any of the Released Claims in any forum or venue. (Conclusion ¶ 3)

Factual background

The case involved FCRA claims concerning consumer privacy and notification when personal information is released to third parties and used for employment purposes. The parties negotiated a class settlement through mediation after written discovery, third-party subpoenas, and a deposition of the defendant's corporate representative. The settlement provided injunctive relief and monetary payments to 18,952 members of the K-Notice Payment Class, with one opt-out and no objections.

Procedural history

Plaintiff Vidal McDowell brought claims against Pluto Acquisition OpCo, LLC under the Fair Credit Reporting Act. After the Court preliminarily approved the class settlement, notice was provided to the class, one class member opted out, and no class member objected or appeared at the final fairness hearing. The district court granted final approval and directed the parties to perform under the settlement agreement.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…