Martini v. Bisignano

No. 4:24-cv-1249-RHH (E.D. Mo. Sept. 30, 2025) · United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, Eastern Division · September 30, 2025 · No. 4:24-cv-1249-RHH

Summary

This memorandum and order from the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri reviews the Social Security Administration's denial of Disability Insurance Benefits for plaintiff Shaley Martini. The court evaluates the Administrative Law Judge's application of the five-step disability determination process, focusing on the persuasiveness of treating physicians' medical opinions and the resulting residual functional capacity assessment. Applying the substantial evidence standard, the court concludes that the ALJ's findings are supported by the record and affirms the Commissioner's decision denying benefits.

Court
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, Eastern Division
Jurisdiction
United States District Court, Eastern District of Missouri
Decision date
September 30, 2025
Docket number
4:24-cv-1249-RHH
Procedural posture
Appeal under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) from the Commissioner's denial of Disability Insurance Benefits after remand from a prior federal district court action.
Standard of review
The court must affirm if the Commissioner's decision complies with applicable legal requirements and is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole. The court considers evidence supporting and detracting from the decision but does not reweigh the evidence or substitute its judgment for the ALJ's.
Precedential value
Nonprecedential district court memorandum and order
Parties
Shaley Martini v. Frank J. Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

judicial review of agency actionadministrative lawdisability definitionada / disability

Practice areas

Social Security disability benefitsadministrative lawfederal judicial review

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the ALJ properly evaluated the medical opinions of Dr. Schoenwalder, Nurse Practitioner Plesons, and Dr. Debroy under 20 C.F.R. § 404.1520c.
  2. Whether the ALJ's residual functional capacity assessment was supported by substantial evidence.
  3. Whether the ALJ properly evaluated Martini's subjective complaints and alleged functional limitations.

Holdings

  1. The ALJ properly evaluated the medical opinions by addressing their supportability and consistency, and substantial evidence supported the ALJ's decision to find the opinions of Dr. Schoenwalder and Nurse Practitioner Plesons unpersuasive while finding portions of Dr. Debroy's opinion persuasive.
  2. The ALJ's determination that Martini could perform light work with additional postural, manipulative, and environmental restrictions was supported by substantial evidence.
  3. The ALJ reasonably found that Martini's statements concerning the intensity, persistence, and limiting effects of her symptoms were not entirely consistent with the medical and other evidence.

Key quotations

Based on the foregoing, the undersigned finds the claimant has the above residual functional capacity assessment, which is supported by the objective medical evidence including imaging results, physical exams, and the longitudinal treatment history. (Tr. 1016)
The Court finds no error on this basis. (Opinion at conclusion)

Factual background

Martini alleged disability based principally on degenerative disc disease, spinal stenosis, osteoarthritis, and chronic pain affecting her spine, knees, and shoulder. Imaging generally showed mild to moderate degenerative changes, while examinations frequently showed normal strength, gait, and extremity mobility; treatment with medication, injections, physical therapy, and radiofrequency ablation provided at least some or significant relief. She had worked as a hair stylist for approximately thirty years and stopped working in February 2018 because of worsening pain.

Procedural history

Martini applied for Disability Insurance Benefits in March 2018, alleging disability beginning February 8, 2018. An ALJ denied the claim in October 2019, and the Appeals Council issued an unfavorable decision in October 2020 after correcting the date last insured. Martini filed a prior federal action, and the district court remanded for further administrative proceedings. After a second hearing, the ALJ again denied benefits on May 20, 2024. The court reviewed the administrative record and affirmed the Commissioner's decision.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…