Williams v. Richmon

Williams v. Richmon · United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division · October 1, 2025 · No. 6:23-cv-257-JDK-KNM

Summary

This United States District Court order adopts the Report and Recommendation of a Magistrate Judge, which recommended dismissing the plaintiff’s pro se civil rights lawsuit for failure to prosecute. The plaintiff, proceeding in forma pauperis, failed to pay the required filing fee or amend his complaint within the specified timeframe and did not file objections to the magistrate’s report. Consequently, the court finds no clear error or abuse of discretion and formally dismisses the case without prejudice.

Court
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Writing for the Court
J. Korb
Jurisdiction
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Decision date
October 1, 2025
Docket number
6:23-cv-257-JDK-KNM
Procedural posture
Civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. §1983 dismissed for failure to prosecute.
Standard of review
Clear error, abuse of discretion, and contrary to law.
Precedential value
nonprecedential
Disposition
dismissed

Topics

civil rightscivil procedure

Practice areas

civil rightscivil procedure

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the district court should adopt the magistrate judge's report dismissing the case for failure to prosecute.

Holdings

  1. The court adopts the magistrate judge's report and dismisses the case without prejudice for failure to prosecute.

Key quotations

The Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 11) as the findings of this Court. It is therefore ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute.

Factual background

Jay Williams, an inmate in Henderson County Jail, filed a pro se §1983 civil rights suit without paying the required filing fee or proceeding in forma pauperis. He failed to satisfy the court's order to pay the fee and amend the complaint, and did not object to the magistrate's report recommending dismissal.

Procedural history

Plaintiff, an inmate, filed pro se under 42 U.S.C. §1983 without paying the filing fee. The case was referred to Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell, who recommended dismissal for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff did not object, and the district court adopted the report and dismissed the case.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…