Eric Newberg, Billy Dewayne Burr, and Christopher A. Lorch v. Wellpath Recovery Solutions and Melinda Masters

Newberg · United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Fort Myers Division · January 7, 2026 · No. 2:20-cv-646-KCD-NPM (consolidated)

Summary

The United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida dismissed the consolidated actions without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with a court order. The plaintiffs failed to file a required pretrial narrative statement or respond to an order to show cause concerning their apparent abandonment of the case.

Court
United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Fort Myers Division
Writing for the Court
Kyle C. Dudek
Jurisdiction
United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Fort Myers Division
Decision date
January 7, 2026
Docket number
2:20-cv-646-KCD-NPM (consolidated)
Procedural posture
After partially granting and partially denying defendants' motion for summary judgment, the court directed plaintiffs to file a pretrial narrative statement. Plaintiffs failed to comply, failed to respond to an order to show cause, and the court dismissed the consolidated action without prejudice for failure to prosecute.
Standard of review
Dismissal under Rule 41(b) for failure to prosecute or disregard of a court order is reviewed for abuse of discretion.
Precedential value
unpublished district court order
Parties
Eric Newberg, Billy Dewayne Burr, Christopher A. Lorch v. Wellpath Recovery Solutions, Melinda Masters
Disposition
dismissed

Topics

civil proceduresanctionscivil rightsprisoners rights

Practice areas

civil procedurecivil rightsprisoner civil rights

Questions Presented

  1. Whether plaintiffs' failure to comply with the court's pretrial order and failure to respond to the order to show cause warranted involuntary dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

Holdings

  1. A plaintiff's failure to comply with a court order and failure to respond to an order to show cause, particularly after being warned that dismissal would result, warrants involuntary dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

Key quotations

upon disregard of an order, especially where the litigant has been forewarned, generally is not an abuse of discretion.

Factual background

The court had directed the three plaintiffs to file and serve a pretrial narrative statement by December 8, 2025. Plaintiffs failed to file the statement, failed to advise the court about settlement discussions, and did not seek appointment of counsel. After the court issued an order to show cause warning that the action could be dismissed for failure to prosecute, plaintiffs neither responded nor requested additional time.

Procedural history

On October 22, 2025, the court granted in part and denied in part defendants' motion for summary judgment and ordered plaintiffs to file and serve a pretrial narrative statement by December 8, 2025. Plaintiffs did not file the statement, notify the court of settlement discussions, seek appointment of counsel, or respond to the court's December 10, 2025 order to show cause. The court concluded that plaintiffs had abandoned their remaining claims and dismissed the case under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…