Wright v. Watson

Wright · United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Terre Haute Division · December 11, 2024 · No. 2:21-cv-00215-JPH-MG

Summary

This order denies a pro se prisoner's motion to waive the remaining balance of an appellate filing fee. The court explains that the obligation to pay the fee is incurred upon filing the notice of appeal and cannot be waived retroactively after the appeal was dismissed for non-payment. Citing Seventh Circuit precedent, the judge concludes the court lacks discretion to forgive the outstanding balance.

Court
United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Terre Haute Division
Writing for the Court
James Patrick Hanlon
Jurisdiction
United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Decision date
December 11, 2024
Docket number
2:21-cv-00215-JPH-MG
Procedural posture
Plaintiff moved to waive the remaining balance of an appellate filing fee after his appeal had been dismissed for failure to pay the fee. The district court denied the motion.
Standard of review
Not expressly stated; the court determined as a matter of law that it lacked discretion to waive the incurred appellate filing fee.
Precedential value
District court order; no precedential status stated
Parties
Marcus D. Wright v. T. J. Watson, Warden of USP Terre Haute, U.S. Attorney General, U.S. Prosecutor of San Antonio, Texas
Disposition
other

Topics

appellate procedurecivil procedureprisoners rightscivil rights

Practice areas

appellate procedurecivil procedureprisoner litigationcivil rights

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the district court had discretion to waive the remaining balance of an appellate filing fee after the notice of appeal was filed and the appeal was dismissed for nonpayment.

Holdings

  1. The district court cannot waive the remaining appellate filing fee because the obligation to pay the fee was incurred when Wright filed his notice of appeal.

Key quotations

This Court does not have discretion to take the action Mr. Wright requests.
the obligation to pay the filing fee "is incurred by filing a notice of appeal; it cannot be avoided by dismissing the appeal, or by failing to pay when the fees are due."

Factual background

Wright, a prisoner, filed a civil action alleging constitutional violations related to being housed with his former co-defendant. His complaint was dismissed for failure to pay the filing fee, and his subsequent appeal was dismissed after he failed to pay the full appellate filing fee. The Seventh Circuit ordered the district court to collect the $505 fee, of which $150 remained unpaid when Wright moved to waive the balance.

Procedural history

Wright filed a civil action alleging constitutional violations arising from his housing with a former co-defendant. The action was dismissed for failure to pay the filing fee. Wright appealed and sought leave to proceed in forma pauperis, but the district court denied that request under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The Seventh Circuit dismissed the appeal for nonpayment of the full filing fee and directed the district court to collect the $505 fee. After a collection order was issued, Wright moved three years later to waive the remaining $150 balance.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…