Gresham v. Awomolo

Case No. 1:24-cv-242 · United States District Court, Western District of Michigan, Southern Division · January 6, 2025 · No. 1:24-cv-242

Summary

This Report and Recommendation from a U.S. Magistrate Judge addresses a pro se prisoner's motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction against prison officials. The plaintiff alleges retaliation, excessive force, and food tampering, claiming these actions threaten his upcoming parole eligibility. After reviewing the allegations and noting the defendants' lack of response, the magistrate recommends denial of the motion, finding the plaintiff failed to demonstrate likelihood of success on the merits or irreparable harm. The document also provides notice regarding the 14-day deadline for filing objections to the recommendation.

Court
United States District Court, Western District of Michigan, Southern Division
Writing for the Court
Sally J. Berens
Jurisdiction
United States District Court, Western District of Michigan, Southern Division
Decision date
January 6, 2025
Docket number
1:24-cv-242
Procedural posture
Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order/preliminary injunction was denied.
Precedential value
nonprecedential
Disposition
dismissed

Topics

prisoners rightscivil rightsinjunctionscivil procedure

Practice areas

civil rightsconstitutional lawcivil procedure

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Plaintiff is likely to succeed on the merits of his retaliation and Eighth Amendment claims and therefore entitled to a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction.

Holdings

  1. The court held that Plaintiff failed to demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits, an inadequate remedy at law, or any compelling reasons to justify injunctive relief; therefore the motion for a temporary restraining order/preliminary injunction was denied.

Key quotations

Plaintiff has failed to satisfy his heavy burden of demonstrating that he is entitled to preliminary injunctive relief.

Factual background

While incarcerated at the Oaks Correctional Facility, Plaintiff alleged that prison staff, including Defendant Awomolo and others, conspired to file false misconduct reports, confiscated his legal and personal property, and threatened to transfer him to a harsher facility, thereby jeopardizing his parole eligibility in 2025.

Procedural history

Plaintiff Michael Gresham filed a complaint on March 8, 2024 alleging retaliation and Eighth Amendment violations while incarcerated at the Oaks Correctional Facility. The district court allowed the retaliation and excessive‑force claims to proceed. Plaintiff previously moved for a preliminary injunction, which the court denied. The present motion raises the same allegations and was likewise denied.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…

More from United States District Court Western District Of Michigan So