Olson v. Perkins

United States District Court, Western District of Washington · May 22, 2025 · No. 2:25-cv-00638

Summary

This federal district court minute order addresses a petitioner's motion to amend a habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Citing Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a), the court explains that the petitioner may amend the petition once as a matter of right prior to the respondent's answer. Noting that an amended petition was already properly filed, the court strikes the motion to amend as moot and directs the clerk to notify the parties and another judge.

Court
United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Writing for the Court
Michelle L. Peterson
Jurisdiction
United States District Court for the Western District of Washington
Decision date
May 22, 2025
Docket number
2:25-cv-00638
Procedural posture
Petitioner filed Motion to Amend; Court struck motion as moot.
Precedential value
nonprecedential
Parties
Soren Richard Olsen, III v. Jeffrey Perkins
Disposition
dismissed

Topics

civil procedure

Practice areas

civil procedurepost-conviction relief

Questions Presented

  1. Whether a habeas petitioner may amend the petition as a matter of right under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a) without court permission.

Holdings

  1. Petitioner may amend the habeas petition as a matter of right, and the motion to amend is moot and struck.

Key quotations

Petitioner need not apply for permission to file a first amended petition, he may do so as a matter of right. (1)

Factual background

Petitioner sought to file an amended habeas petition after no responsive pleading had been filed by the respondent.

Procedural history

Petitioner filed a habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. §2254 and subsequently moved to amend the petition. The court held that, under FRCP 15(a), the petitioner may amend as a matter of right and therefore struck the motion as moot.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…