Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. SW Gen., Inc.

137 S. Ct. 929 (2017) · Supreme Court of the United States · March 21, 2017 · No. 15-1251

Summary

The Supreme Court held that the Federal Vacancies Reform Act’s prohibition on certain nominees serving as acting officers applies to all acting officers serving under the statute, not only first assistants. Lafe Solomon therefore became ineligible to continue serving as acting general counsel of the National Labor Relations Board after the President nominated him for the permanent position. The Court affirmed the D.C. Circuit’s judgment vacating the NLRB’s order against SW General, Inc.

Holdings

  1. Section 3345(b)(1) prohibits a person nominated to fill a vacant presidentially appointed, Senate-confirmed office from performing the duties of that office in an acting capacity under the FVRA, regardless of whether the person serves under § 3345(a)(1), (a)(2), or (a)(3).
  2. Once the President nominated Lafe Solomon to become the NLRB's general counsel, § 3345(b)(1) prohibited him from continuing to serve as acting general counsel under § 3345(a)(3).

Questions Presented

  1. Whether 5 U.S.C. § 3345(b)(1) prohibits a person nominated to fill a vacant presidentially appointed, Senate-confirmed office from continuing to serve as acting officer when the person serves under § 3345(a)(2) or (a)(3), rather than automatically as a first assistant under § 3345(a)(1).
  2. Whether Solomon's continued service as acting NLRB general counsel after his nomination violated the Federal Vacancies Reform Act.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (24)

  • United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U.S. 321, 337 (1906)(cited)
  • Edmond v. United States, 520 U.S. 651, 659 (1997)(cited)
  • Pfizer Inc. v. Government of India, 434 U.S. 308, 312 (1978)(cited)
  • Koons Buick Pontiac GMC, Inc. v. Nigh, 543 U.S. 50, 60–61 (2004)(cited)
  • Knight v. Commissioner, 552 U.S. 181, 188 (2008)(cited)
  • Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Echazabal, 536 U.S. 73, 80–81 (2002)(distinguished)
  • United States v. Vonn, 535 U.S. 55, 65 (2002)(cited)
  • Marx v. General Revenue Corp., 568 U.S. 371 (2013)(cited)
  • Williams v. Taylor, 529 U.S. 362, 404 (2000)(cited)
  • RadLAX Gateway Hotel, LLC v. Amalgamated Bank, 566 U.S. 639, 645 (2012)(cited)

Showing top 10 of 24.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…