Bittner v. United States

Bittner v. United States, 598 U.S. ___ (2023) · Supreme Court of the United States · February 28, 2023 · No. 21-1195

Summary

**Bittner v. United States, 598 U.S. ___ (2023)** – The Supreme Court held that the $10,000 maximum civil penalty for nonwillful violations of the Bank Secrecy Act’s FBAR reporting requirement (31 U.S.C. §5314) accrues on a **per-report, not per-account, basis**. The Court reversed the Fifth Circuit, ruling that a single untimely or inaccurate annual FBAR form constitutes one violation, regardless of the number of foreign accounts involved. The decision rejected the government’s per-account penalty theory, emphasizing statutory text, the *expressio unius* canon, agency guidance, and the rule of lenity.

Holdings

  1. The BSA's $10,000 maximum penalty for nonwillful failure to file a compliant report accrues on a per-report, not a per-account, basis.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the Bank Secrecy Act's $10,000 maximum penalty for nonwillful failure to file a compliant report accrues on a per-report or per-account basis.

Disposition

reversed_and_remanded

Cases Cited (17)

  • United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U.S. 321, 337(cited)
  • Department of Homeland Security v. MacLean, 574 U.S. 383, 391 (2015)(cited)
  • Gallardo v. Marstiller, 596 U.S. ___ (2022)(cited)
  • Skidmore v. Swift & Co., 323 U.S. 134, 140 (1944)(cited)
  • United States v. Boyd, 991 F.3d 1077 (CA9 2021)(cited)
  • United States v. Bittner, 469 F. Supp. 3d 709 (ED Tex. 2020)(cited)
  • Commissioner v. Acker, 361 U.S. 87, 91 (1959)(cited)
  • FCC v. American Broadcasting Co., 347 U.S. 284, 296 (1954)(cited)
  • Keppel v. Tiffin Savings Bank, 197 U.S. 356, 362 (1905)(cited)
  • Tiffany v. National Bank of Mo., 18 Wall. 409, 410 (1874)(cited)

Showing top 10 of 17.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…