Hoffman v. Westcott

604 U. S. ____ (2025) · Supreme Court of the United States · March 18, 2025 · No. 24A893

Summary

This document is a dissenting opinion by Justice Gorsuch regarding the denial of a stay of execution for a Louisiana death row inmate. The petitioner claims that nitrogen hypoxia execution violates his religious rights under RLUIPA by preventing meditative breathing. Justice Gorsuch contends that lower courts improperly assessed his religious beliefs and failed to address his statutory claim, recommending that the case be remanded for proper review.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
United States Supreme Court
Decision date
March 18, 2025
Docket number
24A893
Procedural posture
Application for stay of execution denied by the Supreme Court.
Precedential value
relating-to
Parties
Jessie Hoffman v. Gary Westcott, Secretary, Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections, et al.
Disposition
other

Topics

free exercise clausecivil rightsconstitutional law

Practice areas

civil rightscriminal procedureconstitutional law

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the method of execution by nitrogen hypoxia substantially burdens the plaintiff's religious exercise in violation of RLUIPA.
  2. Whether the Supreme Court should grant a stay of execution pending resolution of the RLUIPA claim.

Holdings

  1. The Court denied the application for a stay of execution.

Factual background

Jessie Hoffman, a Buddhist sentenced to death, challenged the state's planned method of execution by nitrogen hypoxia, arguing it substantially burdens his religious exercise under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA).

Procedural history

The district court rejected Hoffman's RLUIPA claim; the Fifth Circuit affirmed without addressing the claim; the Supreme Court denied the application for a stay of execution.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…