McGuffey Health and Rehabilitation Center v. Gibson

864 So. 2d 1061 (Ala. 2003) · Supreme Court of Alabama · May 9, 2003 · No. 1020289

Summary

The Alabama Supreme Court held that an admission agreement between a nursing home and a resident substantially affected interstate commerce because Medicare funds and care-related materials moved across state lines. The court therefore reversed the trial court's refusal to compel arbitration of the resident's medical-malpractice claim and remanded for further proceedings.

Holdings

  1. Medicare funds moving across state lines may be considered in determining whether a nursing-home admission agreement substantially affects interstate commerce. Because two-thirds of McGuffey's payments for Gibson's care came from out of state and McGuffey purchased materials from out-of-state vendors, the admission agreement substantially affected interstate commerce and the arbitration provision was enforceable.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the nursing-home admission agreement evidenced a transaction substantially affecting interstate commerce so that the Federal Arbitration Act required arbitration of Gibson's medical-malpractice action.

Disposition

reversed_and_remanded

Cases Cited (12)

  • Jim Burke Automotive, Inc. v. Beavers, 674 So. 2d 1260 (Ala. 1995)(followed)
  • Transouth Fin. Corp. v. Bell, 739 So. 2d 1110, 1114 (Ala. 1999)(followed)
  • Sisters of the Visitation v. Cochran Plastering Co., 775 So. 2d 759, 761-62, 765-66 (Ala. 2000)(followed)
  • Potts v. Baptist Health System, Inc., 853 So. 2d 194, 204, 207 (Ala. 2002)(followed)
  • American General Fin., Inc. v. Branch, 793 So. 2d 738 (Ala. 2000)(followed)
  • Lewis v. Conseco Fin. Corp., 848 So. 2d 920 (Ala. 2002)(followed)
  • Summit Health Ltd. v. Pinhas, 500 U.S. 322, 111 S. Ct. 1842, 114 L. Ed. 2d 366 (1991)(persuasive)
  • BCB Anesthesia Care, Ltd. v. Passavant Memorial Area Hospital Association, 36 F.3d 664 (7th Cir. 1994)(persuasive)
  • McElhinney v. Medical Protective Co., 549 F. Supp. 121 (E.D. Ky. 1982)(persuasive)
  • Ex parte Kampis, 826 So. 2d 819, 822 (Ala. 2002)(distinguished)

Showing top 10 of 12.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…