City of Montgomery v. Town of Pike Road

35 So. 3d 575 (Ala. 2009) · Supreme Court of Alabama · June 5, 2009 · No. 1071690

Summary

The Supreme Court of Alabama held that Alabama Code § 11-41-8(b) did not validate annexations by the Town of Pike Road because the Town’s original incorporation was not in doubt. The court reversed the trial court’s dismissal of challenges to the annexations and remanded for further proceedings. Several justices concurred in the result on the ground that the 2008 enactment violated the Alabama Constitution’s single-subject requirement.

Holdings

  1. Section 11-41-8(b) does not apply to all annexations by any city or town. It validates annexations that were otherwise legally proper but whose validity could be questioned because the municipality conducting them had an incorporation that required retroactive validation under § 11-41-8(a).
  2. Section 11-41-8(b) did not apply to Pike Road's purported annexations because Pike Road was a duly incorporated municipality whose incorporation had never been in doubt or questioned.
  3. The trial court erred in concluding that § 11-41-8(b) required dismissal of the County plaintiffs' and Montgomery's claims in their entirety.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Alabama Code § 11-41-8(b), as amended by Act No. 2008-481, retroactively validated the Town of Pike Road's allegedly defective annexations.
  2. Whether § 11-41-8(b) applies only to annexations by municipalities whose original incorporations were themselves subject to validation under § 11-41-8(a).
  3. Whether the trial court erred by dismissing the annexation challenges as moot based solely on Act No. 2008-481.

Disposition

reversed_and_remanded

Cases Cited (24)

  • Scott Bridge Co. v. Wright, 883 So. 2d 1221, 1223 (Ala. 2003)(followed)
  • Continental Nat'l Indem. Co. v. Fields, 926 So. 2d 1033, 1034-35 (Ala. 2005)(followed)
  • Richards v. Izzi, 819 So. 2d 25, 29 n. 3 (Ala. 2001)(followed)
  • Alabama State Fed'n of Labor v. McAdory, 246 Ala. 1, 9-10, 18 So. 2d 810, 815 (1944)(followed)
  • Board of Water & Sewer Comm'rs of Mobile v. Hunter, 956 So. 2d 403, 408-09 (Ala. 2006)(followed)
  • McInnish v. Riley, 925 So. 2d 174, 178 (Ala. 2005)(followed)
  • IMED Corp. v. Systems Eng'g Assocs. Corp., 602 So. 2d 344, 346 (Ala. 1992)(followed)
  • McRae v. Security Pac. Hous. Servs., Inc., 628 So. 2d 429, 432 (Ala. 1993)(followed)
  • Ex parte Jackson, 625 So. 2d 425, 428 (Ala. 1992)(followed)
  • Proctor v. Riley, 903 So. 2d 786, 789-90 (Ala. 2004)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 24.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…