Summary
The Illinois Appellate Court affirmed the circuit court’s judgment for the defendants in a dispute involving an equitable-adoption claim against the estate of Edward Hegner. The court held that the plaintiff had no constitutional right to a jury trial because equitable adoption is an equitable doctrine, and it upheld exclusion of much of the plaintiff’s testimony under the Dead-Man’s Act. The court also held that the Act’s heirship exception did not apply because equitable adoption would not make the plaintiff a legal heir.
Holdings
- An equitable-adoption claim does not carry a constitutional right to a jury trial because equitable adoption is an equitable remedy and Illinois provides no constitutional jury-trial right for claims within equity jurisdiction.
- The heirship exception in subsection 8-201(d) of the Illinois Dead-Man's Act did not permit Lateano to testify about conversations with Hegner or events occurring in Hegner's presence because equitable adoption would not make Lateano an heir; it would merely permit him to share in the estate through an equitable remedy.
Questions Presented
- Whether an equitable-adoption claim carries a constitutional right to a jury trial under the Illinois Constitution.
- Whether the heirship exception to the Illinois Dead-Man's Act permitted Lateano to testify about conversations and events involving the decedent.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (22)
- DeHart v. DeHart, 2013 IL 114137, ¶¶ 52-64(followed)
- In re Parentage of Scarlett Z.-D., 2015 IL 117904, ¶¶ 48, 52-53(followed)
- Prodromos v. Everen Securities, Inc., 389 Ill. App. 3d 157, 174 (2009)(followed)
- Bank One, N.A. v. Borse, 351 Ill. App. 3d 482, 488 (2004)(followed)
- Martin v. Heinold Commodities, Inc., 163 Ill. 2d 33, 72-73 (1994)(followed)
- Lazarus v. Village of Northbrook, 31 Ill. 2d 146, 148 (1964)(followed)
- Martin v. Strubel, 367 Ill. 21, 22-23 (1937)(followed)
- Shrock v. Meier, 2024 IL App (1st) 230069, ¶ 37(followed)
- Benzakry v. Patel, 2017 IL App (3d) 160162, ¶ 31(followed)
- Wolinsky v. Kadison, 2013 IL App (1st) 111186, ¶ 108(followed)
Showing top 10 of 22.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…