Summary
The Arizona Supreme Court answered certified questions concerning conspiracy to commit first-degree murder under Arizona law. It held that conviction requires proof of an intent to kill or to promote or aid in killing, together with an agreement to kill, and cannot be based solely on felony murder or intent to commit an underlying felony. The court also concluded that no completed offense or overt act is required when the conspiracy concerns first-degree murder.
Holdings
- A defendant may not be convicted of conspiracy to commit first-degree murder when the conviction is based only on the commission of felony murder.
- A defendant may be convicted of conspiracy to commit first-degree murder only if the state proves that the defendant intended to kill, or intended to promote or aid in killing, and agreed with a coconspirator to commit murder.
- A defendant may not be convicted of conspiracy to commit first-degree murder based merely on the requisite intent to aid, promote, or commit the underlying felony.
Questions Presented
- Whether Arizona law permits a conviction for conspiracy to commit first-degree murder when the conviction is based only on felony murder.
- Whether a defendant must possess an intent to kill to be convicted of conspiracy to commit first-degree murder.
- Whether the requisite intent to commit the underlying felony, without an intent to kill, is sufficient for a conviction for conspiracy to commit first-degree murder.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (18)
- State v. Evanchyk, No. 2 CA-CR-94-0533, mem. dec. at 2-3 (filed April 23, 1996)(followed)
- Yates v. United States, 354 U.S. 298, 312, 77 S. Ct. 1064, 1073, 1 L. Ed. 2d 1356 (1957)(applied by lower court; not decided by this court)
- Burks v. United States, 437 U.S. 1, 98 S. Ct. 2141, 57 L. Ed. 2d 1 (1978)(noted)
- State v. Willoughby, 181 Ariz. 530, 545, 892 P.2d 1319, 1334 (1995)(followed)
- State v. Arredondo, 155 Ariz. 314, 317, 746 P.2d 484, 487 (1987)(relied upon)
- State v. Ortiz, 131 Ariz. 195, 205, 639 P.2d 1020, 1030 (1981)(relied upon)
- State v. Gretzler, 135 Ariz. 42, 659 P.2d 1 (1983)(noted)
- State v. Apelt, 176 Ariz. 349, 360, 861 P.2d 634, 645 (1993)(distinguished)
- People v. Cortez, 18 Cal. 4th 1223, 77 Cal. Rptr. 2d 733, 960 P.2d 537, 542 (1998)(persuasive authority)
- People v. Swain, 12 Cal. 4th 593, 49 Cal. Rptr. 2d 390, 909 P.2d 994, 1002-03 (1996)(persuasive authority)
Showing top 10 of 18.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…