Summary
The Arizona Supreme Court held that Arizona’s statutory abolition of joint and several liability applies to strict products liability actions. Under A.R.S. § 12-2506, liability among participants in a defective product’s distribution chain is generally several only, with fault apportioned among tortfeasors. The court rejected constitutional challenges under Article 18, Section 6 of the Arizona Constitution and affirmed the superior court and court of appeals.
Holdings
- A.R.S. § 12-2506 abolishes joint and several liability in strict products liability actions except for the specific statutory exceptions in § 12-2506(D). Liability among participants in the chain of distribution is several only, and fault must be apportioned among the tortfeasors.
- The mere purchase of a defective component from a supplier does not establish a conventional principal-agent or master-servant relationship and does not trigger the joint-liability exception in § 12-2506(D)(2).
- Applying several-only liability and comparative fault to strict products liability actions does not violate Article 18, Section 6's anti-abrogation clause or its prohibition on statutory limitations of damages.
Questions Presented
- Whether A.R.S. § 12-2506 abolishes joint and several liability among participants in the chain of distribution in strict products liability actions.
- Whether the agency or servant exception in A.R.S. § 12-2506(D)(2) applies merely because Premier purchased and incorporated Worldwide's component product.
- Whether applying several-only liability and comparative fault to strict products liability actions conflicts with Article 18, Section 6 of the Arizona Constitution.
- Whether A.R.S. §§ 12-2509 and 12-684 preserve joint and several liability in strict products liability actions.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (19)
- Holtz v. Holder, 101 Ariz. 247, 418 P.2d 584 (1966)(followed)
- Holmes v. Hoemako Hosp., 117 Ariz. 403, 573 P.2d 477 (1978)(followed)
- Gehres v. City of Phoenix, 156 Ariz. 484, 753 P.2d 174 (App. 1987)(followed)
- Dietz v. Gen. Elec. Co., 169 Ariz. 505, 821 P.2d 166 (1991)(followed)
- Wiggs v. City of Phoenix, 198 Ariz. 367, 10 P.3d 625 (2000)(distinguished)
- Jimenez v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 183 Ariz. 399, 904 P.2d 861 (1995)(followed)
- O.S. Stapley Co. v. Miller, 103 Ariz. 556, 447 P.2d 248 (1968)(followed)
- Bridgestone/Firestone N. Am. Tire, L.L.C. v. A.P.S. Rent-A-Car & Leasing, Inc., 207 Ariz. 502, 88 P.3d 572 (App. 2004)(followed)
- State Farm Ins. Cos. v. Premier Manufactured Sys., Inc., 213 Ariz. 419, 142 P.3d 1232 (App. 2006)(affirmed)
- Owens v. Truckstops of Am., 915 S.W.2d 420 (Tenn. 1996)(distinguished)
Showing top 10 of 19.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…