Summary
The Supreme Court of Arkansas reversed a summary judgment holding that bankruptcy trustee Warren E. Dupwe was judicially estopped from pursuing tort claims omitted from the debtors' bankruptcy petition. The court held that Arkansas judicial estoppel requires, among other elements, an intent to manipulate the judicial process, and that the record presented genuine issues of material fact regarding intent. The court also concluded that allowing the trustee to pursue the claims would protect rather than impair the interests of the bankruptcy estate and its creditors.
Holdings
- A prima facie case of judicial estoppel requires proof that the party assumed a clearly inconsistent position, did so with intent to manipulate the judicial process for an unfair advantage, successfully maintained the earlier position such that a court relied on it, and impaired or injured the integrity of at least one court.
- The omission of the claims from the bankruptcy schedules was not, by itself, clearly inconsistent conduct warranting judicial estoppel because the record contained no evidence that the omission was intentional rather than the result of mistake or inadvertence.
- Judicial estoppel should not bar the trustee from pursuing the tort action after the bankruptcy estate was reopened and the trustee was substituted as plaintiff because recovery would benefit creditors rather than the debtors accused of manipulating the courts.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Nixes' failure to disclose their tort claims in their bankruptcy petition required judicial estoppel of the action later pursued by the bankruptcy trustee.
- Whether summary judgment was proper when the defendants presented no evidence establishing that the omission was intentional or designed to manipulate the judicial process.
- Whether judicial estoppel should bar the trustee's action after the bankruptcy estate was reopened and the trustee was substituted as plaintiff.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (33)
- Coats v. Gardner, 333 Ark. 581, 970 S.W.2d 802 (1998)(followed)
- Nielsen v. Berger-Nielsen, 347 Ark. 996, 69 S.W.3d 414 (2002)(followed)
- Ford v. Arkansas Game & Fish Commission, 335 Ark. 245, 979 S.W.2d 897 (1998)(followed)
- Nelson v. River Valley Bank & Trust, 334 Ark. 172, 971 S.W.2d 777 (1998)(followed)
- McLane v. Davis, 353 Ark. 539, 110 S.W.3d 251 (2003)(discussed)
- Francis v. Francis, 343 Ark. 104, 31 S.W.3d 841 (2000)(discussed)
- Employers Surplus Insurance v. Murphy Oil USA, 338 Ark. 299, 993 S.W.2d 481 (1999)(discussed)
- First Commercial Bank, N.A. v. Walker, 333 Ark. 100, 969 S.W.2d 146 (1998)(discussed)
- Edwards v. State, 328 Ark. 394, 943 S.W.2d 600 (1997)(discussed)
- Muncrief v. Green, 251 Ark. 580, 473 S.W.2d 907 (1971)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 33.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…