Summary
The Arkansas Supreme Court considered whether a foreclosure action for unpaid municipal improvement district assessments was barred by the applicable three-year statute of limitations. It held that the special improvement taxes became delinquent under the specific statute governing improvement districts, rather than under the general tax-delinquency provisions, and that the foreclosure complaint was untimely. The court reversed the circuit court's summary judgment in favor of Vimy Ridge Municipal Water Improvement District No. 139.
Holdings
- The general-tax provisions of Title 26 do not apply to municipal improvement district special taxes unless the district specifically adopts the applicable installment scheme by ordinance; absent such adoption, the specific delinquency provision in Ark. Code Ann. § 14-86-1204 governs.
- Vimy Ridge's October 1, 2004 foreclosure complaint was barred by the three-year statute of limitations because the 2001 assessment became delinquent more than three years before the complaint was filed.
Questions Presented
- Whether the foreclosure action for the 2001 municipal improvement district assessment was barred by the applicable three-year statute of limitations.
- Whether the general-tax delinquency provisions in Ark. Code Ann. § 26-36-201 applied to the special taxes of the municipal improvement district.
Disposition
reversed
Cases Cited (4)
- Vimy Ridge Mun. Water Improvement Dist. No. 139 of Little Rock v. Ryles, 373 Ark. 366, 284 S.W.3d 70 (2008)(followed)
- City of Maumelle v. Jeffrey Sand Co., 353 Ark. 686, 120 S.W.3d 55 (2003)(followed)
- Barclay v. First Paris Holding Co., 344 Ark. 711, 42 S.W.3d 496 (2001)(followed)
- Quapaw Central Business Improvement Dist. v. Bond-Kinman, Inc., 315 Ark. 703, 870 S.W.2d 390 (1994)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…