Lambert v. LQ Management, L.L.C.

426 S.W.3d 437 (Ark. 2013) · Supreme Court of Arkansas · March 14, 2013

Summary

The Arkansas Supreme Court answered a certified question concerning whether Arkansas Code Annotated section 16-118-107 revived an individual common-law cause of action for retaliation under Arkansas workers’ compensation law. The court held that it did not, concluding that section 11-9-107 expressly annulled the common-law remedies and made the workers’ compensation remedies exclusive. The court therefore answered the certified question in the negative.

Court
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Writing for the Court
Karen R. Baker
Jurisdiction
Arkansas
Decision date
March 14, 2013
Procedural posture
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas certified a question of Arkansas law to the Supreme Court of Arkansas concerning whether Arkansas Code Annotated section 16-118-107 revived a common-law retaliation cause of action abolished by section 11-9-107.
Standard of review
The court reviewed the certified question of statutory construction de novo, applying Arkansas rules of statutory interpretation and strict construction of workers' compensation statutes.
Precedential value
Published Arkansas Supreme Court opinion answering a certified question of Arkansas law; precedential.
Parties
John R. Lambert, II v. LQ Management, L.L.C.
Disposition
other

Topics

statutory interpretationplain meaning ruleworkers compensationappellate procedureremedies

Practice areas

employment lawworkers compensationstatutory interpretationappellate procedureremedies

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Arkansas Code Annotated section 16-118-107 revived an individual common-law cause of action and related remedies for retaliation under Arkansas workers' compensation law after section 11-9-107 expressly annulled those remedies.
  2. Whether section 16-118-107 permitted additional damages for retaliatory conduct covered by section 11-9-107.

Holdings

  1. No. Section 16-118-107 did not revive the individual common-law cause of action or remedies for retaliatory discharge based on filing a workers' compensation claim.

Key quotations

In reviewing the certified question, we hold that Ark.Code Ann. § 16-118-107 does not revive the individual cause of action for common-law remedies for retaliation under the Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Act. (at 7)
The language employed by the General Assembly in Ark. Code Ann. § 11-9-107 expressly annulled the common-law actions and remedies, and explicitly states that the workers’ compensation law is the exclusive remedy. (at 7)

Factual background

Lambert alleged that LQ Management terminated him in retaliation for asserting rights under Arkansas workers' compensation law. He sought damages under Arkansas's crime-victims' civil-liability statute, contending that retaliatory interference with a workers' compensation claim could constitute a felony. LQ Management argued that the Workers' Compensation Act made its remedies exclusive and had abolished the common-law retaliation action.

Procedural history

Lambert filed a retaliation complaint in Pulaski County Circuit Court alleging termination for asserting rights under Arkansas workers' compensation statutes and seeking damages under section 16-118-107. LQ Management removed the action to federal court and moved to dismiss, arguing that section 11-9-107 abolished the retaliation claim. The parties jointly requested certification, and the Arkansas Supreme Court accepted and answered the certified question.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…