Nooner v. State

2013 Ark. 317 (2013) · Supreme Court of Arkansas · September 5, 2013 · No. CR-13-544

Summary

The Supreme Court of Arkansas dismissed Terrick Nooner’s appeal from the denial of his Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 37.1 petition and held his related motions moot. The court concluded that the petition was untimely because it was filed approximately eighteen years after issuance of the mandate, depriving the trial court and appellate court of jurisdiction.

Court
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Writing for the Court
Per Curiam
Jurisdiction
Arkansas
Decision date
September 5, 2013
Docket number
CR-13-544
Procedural posture
Appeal from the denial of a petition for postconviction relief under Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 37.1, with related pro se motions for appointment of counsel, extraordinary writs, expedited consideration and temporary relief, certiorari, and sanctions.
Standard of review
The appellate court dismissed the appeal when it was clear from the record that the appellant could not prevail; the timeliness and jurisdictional effect of the Rule 37.1 petition were reviewed under the applicable procedural rules.
Precedential value
Published Arkansas Supreme Court opinion
Parties
Terrick Nooner v. State of Arkansas
Disposition
dismissed

Topics

state post-conviction reliefpost-conviction reliefappellate procedureappellate jurisdictionmootness

Practice areas

criminal procedurepost-conviction reliefappellate procedure

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Nooner's 2013 Rule 37.1 petition was timely when it was filed approximately eighteen years after issuance of the mandate affirming his judgment.
  2. Whether the appeal from the denial of the untimely postconviction petition should be dismissed because Nooner could not prevail.
  3. Whether Nooner's related motions for appointment of counsel, extraordinary writs, expedited consideration and temporary relief, certiorari, and sanctions remained justiciable after dismissal of the appeal.

Holdings

  1. A petitioner whose judgment has been affirmed on appeal must file a Rule 37.1 petition within sixty days after the mandate issues; Nooner's petition, filed approximately eighteen years after the mandate, was untimely.
  2. The time limitations in Rule 37.2(c) are jurisdictional; failure to comply deprives the trial court of jurisdiction to consider the Rule 37.1 petition and deprives the appellate court of jurisdiction over the appeal.
  3. An appeal from an order denying postconviction relief will not be permitted to proceed when it is clear from the record that the appellant could not prevail.
  4. The motions for appointment of counsel, extraordinary writs, expedited consideration and temporary relief, certiorari, and sanctions were moot following dismissal of the appeal.

Key quotations

An appeal from an order that denied a petition for postconviction relief will not be permitted to proceed where it is clear that the appellant could not prevail.
Time limitations imposed in Rule 37.2(c) for filing a petition are jurisdictional in nature.

Factual background

Nooner was convicted by a jury of aggravated robbery in 1993 and sentenced to life imprisonment. The conviction was affirmed on appeal, and the mandate issued in 1995. Nooner filed a Rule 37.1 postconviction petition on March 25, 2013, approximately eighteen years after the mandate issued.

Procedural history

Nooner was convicted of aggravated robbery and sentenced to life imprisonment in 1993, and the Supreme Court of Arkansas affirmed in 1995. The mandate issued in 1995. In 2013, Nooner filed a Rule 37.1 petition, which the Saline County Circuit Court denied as untimely. The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal because Nooner could not prevail and held that the related motions were moot.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…