Bowerman v. State

2016 Ark. 180 (2016) · Supreme Court of Arkansas · April 21, 2016 · No. CR-13-431

Summary

The Supreme Court of Arkansas denied Arbury Bowerman’s pro se motion for a copy of the direct-appeal transcript at public expense. The court held that indigency alone was insufficient and that Bowerman had not demonstrated a compelling need or identified a specific issue requiring the transcript for anticipated federal habeas proceedings.

Court
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Writing for the Court
Per Curiam
Jurisdiction
Arkansas
Decision date
April 21, 2016
Docket number
CR-13-431
Procedural posture
Bowerman petitioned the Supreme Court of Arkansas for a copy of the transcript from his direct appeal at public expense while preparing a federal habeas corpus petition.
Precedential value
Published Arkansas Supreme Court opinion
Parties
Arbury Bowerman v. State of Arkansas
Disposition
other

Topics

state post-conviction relieffederal habeas corpusappellate procedurecriminal procedure

Practice areas

criminal procedurepost-conviction reliefappellate procedurefederal habeas corpus

Questions Presented

  1. Whether an indigent postconviction petitioner is entitled to a free copy of a transcript merely because he seeks to prepare a federal habeas corpus petition.
  2. Whether Bowerman demonstrated the compelling need or good cause required for the Arkansas Supreme Court to provide him with a copy of the direct-appeal transcript at public expense.

Holdings

  1. Indigency alone does not entitle a petitioner to free copies of materials on file with the Arkansas appellate courts.
  2. A petitioner seeking a copy of written material on file with an Arkansas appellate court must show a compelling need for the copy to support a specific allegation contained in a timely petition for postconviction relief.
  3. An appellant's prior access to a record for preparation of a pro se appellate brief does not entitle the appellant to borrow a transcript for use in other proceedings.

Key quotations

We have consistently held that indigency alone does not entitle a petitioner to free copies of any material on file with either this court or the Arkansas Court of Appeals. (at 2)
A petitioner seeking a copy of written material on file with an Arkansas appellate court must show a compelling need for the copy to support a specific allegation contained in a timely petition for postconviction relief. (at 2)

Factual background

Bowerman was convicted of aggravated robbery, residential burglary, and third-degree battery and sentenced to an aggregate 540 months' imprisonment. After unsuccessful direct appeal and Rule 37.1 postconviction proceedings, he sought a copy of the direct-appeal transcript at public expense. He asserted indigency and stated that he was preparing a federal habeas corpus petition, but he did not identify any specific federal issue for which the transcript was necessary.

Procedural history

Bowerman was convicted in the Logan County Circuit Court of aggravated robbery, residential burglary, and third-degree battery and received an aggregate sentence of 540 months' imprisonment. The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed his convictions. The circuit court denied his Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 37.1 postconviction petition, and the Supreme Court of Arkansas affirmed that denial. Bowerman then filed the present motion for a publicly funded copy of the direct-appeal transcript.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…