Summary
Estate of Bonanno, 165 Cal. App. 4th 7 (2008) – Key legal topics: equitable estoppel, spousal property petition (Prob. Code § 13650), election to administer (Prob. Code § 13502), and settlement agreements waiving statutory rights. The court held that a surviving spouse who entered a settlement agreement providing for distribution through an order of final distribution, and who acquiesced in years of estate administration, was estopped from later filing a spousal property petition to have her share pass without administration. The ruling reversed the probate court, finding that allowing the spouse to bypass administration would be inequitable to the administrator and estate attorney, whose commissions and fees would be reduced.
Holdings
- Jean Bonanno is estopped from arguing that the property she is to receive is to come to her without probate administration when Connolly has acted as administrator for years.
Questions Presented
- Whether Jean Bonanno is estopped from asserting her statutory rights under Probate Code sections 13500 et seq. to have her share of the decedent's estate pass to her without administration, after entering into a settlement agreement that contemplated administration and final distribution, and after allowing the estate to be administered for years.
Disposition
reversed
Cases Cited (6)
- Estate of Jimenez, 56 Cal.App.4th 733 (1997)(cited for purposes of probate administration)
- Estate of Denman, 94 Cal.App.3d 289 (1979)(cited for duties of executor or administrator)
- Dawes v. Rich, 60 Cal.App.4th 24 (1997)(cited for personal liability of surviving spouse)
- In re Marriage of D'Antoni, 125 Cal.App.3d 747 (1981)(cited for personal liability of surviving spouse)
- In re J.L., 159 Cal.App.4th 1010 (2008)(cited for definition of estoppel)
- Feduniak v. California Coastal Com., 148 Cal.App.4th 1346 (2007)(cited for elements of equitable estoppel)