Blake v. King

184 P.3d 52 (Colo. 2008) · Supreme Court of Colorado · May 16, 2008

Summary

The Colorado Supreme Court reviewed the Title Board’s action concerning proposed Initiative 2007-2008 #62, which would establish a just-cause requirement for discharging or suspending employees. The court held that the initiative contained a single subject, that its titles clearly and fairly expressed the measure without impermissible catch phrases, and that amendments made in response to legislative staff comments did not require resubmission. The court affirmed the Title Board’s action.

Court
Supreme Court of Colorado
Writing for the Court
Justice Rice; Justice Hobbs
Jurisdiction
Colorado
Decision date
May 16, 2008
Procedural posture
Original proceeding under section 1-40-107(2), C.R.S. (2007), seeking review of the Colorado Title Board's action fixing the title, ballot title, and submission clause for proposed Initiative 2007-2008 #62.
Standard of review
The Supreme Court reviews Title Board actions within a limited scope and will reverse only for a material and significant omission, misstatement, or misrepresentation. The court gives legitimate presumptions in favor of the propriety of the Board's action and does not rewrite titles, address the merits of a proposed initiative, interpret its language, or predict its future application.
Precedential value
Published opinion of the Supreme Court of Colorado; precedential.
Parties
Joseph Blake v. King, Colorado Title Board
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

election lawappellate procedureemployment at-willemployment contractsconstitutional law

Practice areas

constitutional lawelection lawemployment lawappellate procedure

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Initiative 2007-2008 #62 violated article V, section 1(5.5) of the Colorado Constitution by containing more than one subject.
  2. Whether the Title Board's titles clearly and fairly expressed the initiative's subject and true intent and meaning.
  3. Whether the terms "just cause" and "mediation" were impermissible catch phrases.
  4. Whether changes made to the initiative in response to legislative staff comments were substantial amendments requiring resubmission to the directors of the Legislative Council and the Office of Legislative Legal Services.

Holdings

  1. Initiative 2007-2008 #62 contains only one subject: establishing a just-cause requirement for discharging or suspending employees.
  2. The titles set by the Title Board clearly and accurately express the subject and true intent and meaning of Initiative 2007-2008 #62 and are not misleading.
  3. The phrases "just cause" and "mediation" are not impermissible catch phrases.
  4. The proponents were not required to resubmit the amended initiative to the directors of the Legislative Council and the Office of Legislative Legal Services because the changes were made directly in response to legislative staff comments.

Key quotations

In determining whether a proposed initiative comports with the single subject requirement, [w]e do not address the merits of a proposed initiative, nor do we interpret its language or predict its application if adopted by the electorate. (59)
While titles must be fair, clear, accurate and complete, the Title Board is not required to set out every detail of an initiative. (60)
"Just cause" accurately describes an element of the Initiative. In addition, the term sets forth a legal standard commonly used in the law. Likewise, "mediation" is a term commonly used in the law. (61)

Factual background

Initiative 2007-2008 #62 proposed amending the Colorado Constitution to prohibit an employer from discharging or suspending an employee without first establishing just cause. It defined just cause, required written documentation of the basis for discipline, and created a mediation process through which an employee could seek back pay or reinstatement. After legislative staff questioned whether the measure addressed layoffs caused by lack of work or employer bankruptcy, proponents added provisions addressing layoffs affecting ten percent or more of the Colorado workforce and employer bankruptcy.

Procedural history

The Title Board fixed titles for Initiative 2007-2008 #62 at its February 20, 2008 public meeting. Blake filed a motion for rehearing, which the Title Board denied on March 5, 2008. Blake then commenced this original proceeding challenging the initiative under Colorado's single-subject and clear-title requirements and challenging changes made to the initiative after legislative staff review.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…