Shear v. Shear

703 So. 2d 632 (Conn. Ct. App. 1997) · Connecticut Appellate Court · October 14, 2025 · No. AC47263

Summary

The Connecticut Appellate Court dismissed the plaintiff’s appeal challenging a January 2024 custody order as moot. During the appeal, a subsequent June 2024 custody order superseded the challenged order, leaving the appellate court unable to provide practical relief.

Court
Connecticut Appellate Court
Writing for the Court
Alvord; Elgo; Keller
Jurisdiction
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decision date
October 14, 2025
Docket number
AC47263
Procedural posture
Appeal dismissed as moot
Precedential value
published
Parties
Daniel Shear v. Yupaporn Shear
Disposition
dismissed

Topics

family lawappellate jurisdictionmootnesschild custodydissolution of marriage

Practice areas

family law

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the appeal is moot because the challenged custody order has been superseded and no practical relief is available.

Holdings

  1. The appeal is moot; the court lacks jurisdiction to entertain it and therefore dismisses the appeal.

Key quotations

It is a well-settled general rule that the existence of an actual controversy is an essential requisite to appellate jurisdiction; it is not the province of appellate courts to decide moot questions, disconnected from the granting of actual relief or from the determination of which no practical relief can follow. (at 3)

Factual background

The marriage was dissolved in 2012 and the parties' written separation agreement provided joint custody with the child residing primarily with the defendant. After extensive litigation, the trial court issued an August 2022 ex parte order granting the plaintiff sole legal and physical custody. In January 2024 the trial court modified the arrangement, awarding joint custody to the defendant and setting a parenting schedule. Subsequent orders in 2024 superseded that custody order.

Procedural history

The parties dissolved their marriage in 2012. The trial court incorporated the parties' separation agreement granting joint custody with the child residing with the defendant. Subsequent litigation led to an August 2022 order awarding the plaintiff sole custody, a January 2024 order granting joint custody to the defendant, and several motions for reconsideration and amendment. The appellate court held the appeal moot because the January 2024 custody order was superseded by later orders.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…