Poole v. City of Waterbury

266 Conn. 68 (2003) · Supreme Court of Connecticut · September 30, 2003

Summary

The Connecticut Supreme Court considered whether retired Waterbury firefighters and widows had vested contractual rights to the specific medical benefits provided under collective bargaining agreements in effect when the firefighters retired. The court held that the plaintiffs had a vested right to medical benefits generally, but not to the specific indemnity plan then in effect, and therefore reversed the trial court's judgment granting injunctive relief.

Holdings

  1. The collective bargaining agreements created a vested right to medical benefits generally that survived expiration of the agreements.
  2. Neither a presumption against vesting nor a presumption in favor of vesting applies; courts must apply ordinary principles of contract interpretation.
  3. The retirees did not have a vested right to the exact medical plan in effect at retirement.
  4. The conversion did not violate the retirees’ vested contractual right because the record did not establish that the managed care plan substantially reduced benefits or substantially increased costs for the retirees as a group.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the retirees’ right to medical benefits survived expiration of the collective bargaining agreements and therefore vested.
  2. Whether the vested right encompassed the specific medical plan in effect when each retiree retired.
  3. Whether the defendants’ conversion from the traditional indemnity plan to a managed care plan violated the retirees’ vested contractual right.

Disposition

reversed_and_remanded

Cases Cited (27)

  • Litton Financial Printing Division v. National Labor Relations Board, 501 U.S. 190, 207, 111 S. Ct. 2215, 115 L. Ed. 2d 177 (1991)(followed)
  • United Food & Commercial Workers International Union v. Gold Star Sausage Co., 897 F.2d 1022, 1026 (10th Cir. 1990)(followed)
  • Bidlack v. Wheelabrator Corp., 993 F.2d 603, 606-10 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 909 (1993)(followed)
  • Pineman v. Oechslin, 195 Conn. 405, 415-17, 488 A.2d 803 (1985)(distinguished)
  • Fennell v. Hartford, 238 Conn. 809, 816-17, 681 A.2d 934 (1996)(distinguished)
  • American Federation of Grain Millers v. International Multifoods Corp., 116 F.3d 976, 980 (2d Cir. 1997)(followed)
  • Rosetto v. Pabst Brewing Co., 217 F.3d 539, 543 (7th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1192 (2001)(followed)
  • International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America, U.A.W. v. Skinner Engine Co., 188 F.3d 130, 137-39, 141 (3d Cir. 1999)(partially followed)
  • Anchorage v. Gentile, 922 P.2d 248, 252, 256-57 (Alaska 1996)(followed)
  • Maurer v. Joy Technologies, Inc., 212 F.3d 907, 914-17 (6th Cir. 2000)(distinguished)

Showing top 10 of 27.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…