Summary
The Supreme Court of Connecticut held that an employer's statutory lien under General Statutes § 31-293(a) includes a credit for unknown future workers' compensation benefits in the amount of an injured employee's net recovery from a third-party tortfeasor. The court concluded that the lien's scope is coextensive with the employer's statutory claim and affirmed the Compensation Review Board's decision.
Holdings
- The scope of an employer's lien under General Statutes § 31-293(a) is coextensive with the scope of the employer's statutory claim and therefore includes a credit for unknown, future workers' compensation benefits in the amount of the employee's net proceeds from a third-party recovery.
- The court declined to impose a requirement that the employer prove that a double recovery actually exists before applying the credit; § 31-293(a) gives the employer's claim precedence over the employee's claim in the third-party recovery.
- The Department did not waive its claim to a credit for unknown future benefits by choosing to notify the plaintiff of its lien rather than filing a direct action against the third-party tortfeasor.
Questions Presented
- Whether General Statutes § 31-293(a)'s statutory lien provision entitles an employer to a credit for unknown, future workers' compensation benefits in the amount of an injured employee's net proceeds from a third-party judgment or settlement.
- Whether the employer waived its right to a future-benefit credit by notifying the plaintiff's counsel of the lien instead of filing a direct action against the third-party tortfeasor.
- Whether the court should require an employer to prove that a double recovery actually exists before applying the statutory lien credit.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (25)
- Harpaz v. Laidlaw Transit, Inc., 286 Conn. 102, 942 A.2d 396 (2008)(followed)
- Enquist v. General Datacom, 218 Conn. 19, 587 A.2d 1029 (1991)(followed)
- Saunders v. Firtel, 293 Conn. 515, 978 A.2d 487 (2009)(followed)
- McWeeny v. Hartford, 287 Conn. 56, 946 A.2d 862 (2008)(followed)
- Weems v. Citigroup, Inc., 289 Conn. 769, 961 A.2d 349 (2008)(followed)
- Manifold v. Ragaglia, 272 Conn. 410, 862 A.2d 292 (2004)(followed)
- Stuart v. Stuart, 297 Conn. 26, 996 A.2d 259 (2010)(followed)
- Libby v. Goodwin Pontiac-GMC Truck, Inc., 241 Conn. 170, 695 A.2d 1036 (1997)(followed)
- Rosenbaum v. Hartford News Co., 92 Conn. 398, 103 A. 120 (1918)(followed)
- Stavola v. Palmer, 136 Conn. 670, 73 A.2d 831 (1950)(discussed)
Showing top 10 of 25.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…