Summary
The First Court of Appeals of Texas reviews the adjudication of Rodney Wayne Gray’s guilt after deferred-adjudication community supervision. The court holds that, under Texas Penal Code section 46.02(a-1)(2)(A), the State proved by a preponderance of the evidence that Gray was engaged in criminal activity, including possession or attempted possession of methamphetamine, while carrying a handgun in a vehicle under his control. The court affirms the trial court’s judgment and eight-year sentence.
Holdings
- The phrase 'engaged in criminal activity' broadly encompasses criminal action or conduct, except for a Class C misdemeanor that is a violation of a traffic or boating law or ordinance.
- The State need not obtain a conviction for the underlying criminal activity; it may prove that activity under the applicable preponderance-of-the-evidence standard as part of proving the unlawful-carrying violation.
- The evidence supported a reasonable belief, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Gray was engaged in criminal activity by possessing methamphetamine or, at least, attempting to possess it while carrying the handgun.
- The trial court's failure to find unauthorized use of a vehicle or possession with intent to deliver did not preclude a finding that Gray possessed or attempted to possess methamphetamine and was therefore engaged in criminal activity for purposes of section 46.02(a-1)(2)(A).
Questions Presented
- Whether the evidence was sufficient under the preponderance-of-the-evidence standard to show that Gray was engaged in criminal activity while knowingly carrying a handgun in a vehicle under his control, as required by Texas Penal Code section 46.02(a-1)(2)(A).
- Whether the trial court abused its discretion by adjudicating Gray guilty based on the unlawful-carrying violation despite finding the unauthorized-use allegation not true and declining to find the possession-with-intent-to-deliver allegation true.
- Whether the State was required to obtain a conviction or laboratory testing for the underlying criminal activity before proving the unlawful-carrying violation.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (28)
- Smith v. State, 286 S.W.3d 333, 342 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009)(followed)
- Bell v. State, 649 S.W.3d 867, 898 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2022, pet. ref'd)(followed)
- Hacker v. State, 389 S.W.3d 860, 865 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013)(followed)
- Rickels v. State, 202 S.W.3d 759, 763-64 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006)(followed)
- Cardona v. State, 665 S.W.2d 492, 493-94 (Tex. Crim. App. 1984)(followed)
- Garrett v. State, 619 S.W.2d 172, 174 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1981)(followed)
- Black v. State, 411 S.W.3d 25, 28-30 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2013, no pet.)(followed)
- Medina v. State, 555 S.W.3d 581, 590 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2011, pet. ref'd)(followed)
- Edwards v. State, 666 S.W.3d 571, 575 (Tex. Crim. App. 2023)(followed)
- Rodriguez v. State, No. 14-23-00780-CR, 2024 WL 4234265, at *2-3 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Sept. 19, 2024, no pet.)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 28.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…