Summary
The Ninth Court of Appeals of Texas denied Mandy Jo Cook’s petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for temporary relief. The court held that her challenge to the trial court’s judgment nunc pro tunc correcting a divorce decree could be addressed in her pending appeal, and that the benefits of mandamus review were outweighed by its detriments.
Holdings
- Mandamus relief was not appropriate because Cook's challenge to the judgment nunc pro tunc could be addressed in the appeal she had already perfected.
- The motion for temporary relief was denied.
Questions Presented
- Whether mandamus relief was appropriate to challenge a judgment nunc pro tunc allegedly entered after expiration of the trial court's plenary power.
- Whether Cook had an adequate remedy by appeal when she had already perfected an appeal from the judgment nunc pro tunc.
- Whether temporary relief was warranted to prevent enforcement of the substituted decree or distribution of disputed sale proceeds.
Disposition
writ_denied
Cases Cited (3)
- Castilleja v. Camero, 414 S.W.2d 431, 433 (Tex. 1967)(applied)
- In re Team Rocket, L.P., 256 S.W.3d 257, 262 (Tex. 2008)(applied)
- In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 136 (Tex. 2004)(applied)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…