Summary
The Tenth Court of Appeals of Texas affirmed Tomika Shanee Oliver’s conviction for felony evading arrest or detention with a vehicle and her ninety-nine-year sentence following two felony enhancements. The court held that Oliver forfeited her complaint regarding the State’s discussion of parole law during punishment-phase closing argument because she did not object at trial.
Holdings
- A defendant's failure to object to a jury argument forfeits the right to complain about that argument on appeal; because an objection was necessary to preserve any error concerning the State's discussion of parole law, Oliver's sole issue was overruled.
Questions Presented
- Whether the State's discussion of parole law during the punishment-phase final argument warranted a new trial despite Oliver's failure to object.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (2)
- Cockrell v. State, 933 S.W.2d 73, 89 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996)(followed)
- Sanders v. State, No. 10-12-00019-CR, 2012 WL 5974017, at *3 (Tex. App.—Waco Nov. 29, 2012, pet. ref'd) (mem. op., not designated for publication)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…