Summary
The Thirteenth Court of Appeals of Texas reviewed three appeals from the revocation of Gerardo Amador Reyes’s community supervision. The court determined, after independently reviewing the record and Anders briefs, that there were no arguable grounds for appeal, granted counsel’s motions to withdraw, and affirmed the trial court’s judgments. The opinion is designated not for publication.
Holdings
- The court found no issue that would arguably support an appeal and no reversible error in the trial court's judgments.
- The court granted appointed counsel's motions to withdraw and ordered counsel to provide Reyes with the opinion and judgments and advise him of his right to seek discretionary review.
Questions Presented
- Whether independent review of the records disclosed any nonfrivolous or reversible issue after appointed counsel filed Anders briefs.
- Whether appointed appellate counsel should be permitted to withdraw after complying with Anders and Texas requirements.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (9)
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967)(followed)
- In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 403, 406 n.9, 408–09, 408 n.17, 411 n.35 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008) (orig. proceeding)(followed)
- Hawkins v. State, 112 S.W.3d 340, 343–44 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi–Edinburg 2003, no pet.)(followed)
- Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 n.3, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991)(followed)
- High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 813 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978)(followed)
- Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–22 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014)(followed)
- Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988)(followed)
- Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005)(followed)
- Ex parte Owens, 206 S.W.3d 670, 673 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…