Summary
The Eighth Court of Appeals of Texas dismissed Kavonnie Edwards’s attempted appeal from the criminal mischief judgment entered against Jeremiah McNezer. The court held that Edwards, as the complaining witness rather than a party to the criminal proceeding, lacked standing to appeal and that the court therefore lacked jurisdiction.
Holdings
- A complaining witness is not a party to a criminal proceeding and lacks standing to participate as a party or contest the disposition of the criminal charge, including by appealing the trial court's judgment.
- The court of appeals lacked jurisdiction over an appeal filed by an improper party and was required to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
Questions Presented
- Whether a complaining witness who is not a party to a criminal proceeding has standing to appeal the criminal judgment or contest its disposition.
- Whether the court of appeals had jurisdiction over an appeal filed by the complaining witness rather than by the State or the criminal defendant.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (8)
- Tex. Ass’n of Bus. v. Tex. Air Control Bd., 852 S.W.2d 440, 444 (Tex. 1993)(followed)
- Gunn v. Cavanaugh, 391 S.W.2d 723, 724–25 (Tex. 1965)(followed)
- State v. Naylor, 466 S.W.3d 783, 787 (Tex. 2015)(followed)
- In re Marriage of Thrash, 605 S.W.3d 224, 228–29 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2020, pet. denied)(followed)
- Tex. Quarter Horse Ass’n v. Am. Legion Dep’t of Tex., 496 S.W.3d 175, 181–82 (Tex. App.—Austin 2016, no pet.)(followed)
- In re State ex rel. Sistrunk, 142 S.W.3d 497, 502 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2004, orig. proceeding) (per curiam)(followed)
- Cardenas v. State, No. 13-23-00443-CR, 2024 WL 5199222, at *10 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi Dec. 19, 2024, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication)(followed)
- Davis v. State, 177 S.W.3d 355, 362 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2005, no pet.) (en banc)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…