Summary
The Seventh District Court of Appeals of Texas considered a permissive interlocutory appeal concerning whether Texas’s Recreational Use Statute applies to a paid hunting lease and to claims characterized as active negligence. The court held that the statute applied because the landowner had qualifying liability insurance and that the statute covers both negligent-activity and premises-liability claims. The court reversed the order denying summary judgment and rendered judgment for Pellizzari.
Holdings
- The Texas Recreational Use Statute applies to paid recreational entry and does not exclude a business invitee or commercial lessee merely because the entrant paid for the hunting lease. Pellizzari established the statute's applicability through the statutory liability-insurance alternative in Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code section 75.003(c)(3).
- The Texas Recreational Use Statute applies to both premises-defect claims and negligent-activity or negligent-act claims when the claims otherwise fall within the statute's scope. The characterization 'active negligence' does not remove a claim from the statute.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Texas Recreational Use Statute applies to a paid hunting lease and to a business invitee or commercial lessee.
- Whether the Texas Recreational Use Statute applies to claims characterized as active negligence, including negligent acts or activities rather than premises defects.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (31)
- White Star Energy, Inc. v. Ridgefield Permian Mins., LLC, 725 S.W.3d 505, 509-10 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2025, no pet.)(followed)
- Elephant Ins. Co., LLC v. Kenyon, 644 S.W.3d 137, 142 (Tex. 2022)(followed)
- Sabre Travel Int’l, Ltd. v. Deutsche Lufthansa AG, 567 S.W.3d 725, 732 (Tex. 2019)(followed)
- Motiva Enters., LLC v. Whitmire, No. 09-25-00053-CV, 2026 Tex. App. LEXIS 2824, at *15-16 (Tex. App.—Beaumont Mar. 26, 2026, no pet.)(followed)
- Valence Operating Co. v. Dorsett, 164 S.W.3d 565, 661 (Tex. 2005)(followed)
- Duarte-Viera v. Fannie Mae, 560 S.W.3d 258, 261-62 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2016, no pet.)(followed)
- McIntyre v. Ramirez, 109 S.W.3d 741, 748 (Tex. 2003)(followed)
- City of Waco v. Kirwan, 298 S.W.3d 618, 623 (Tex. 2009)(followed)
- Poehls v. Turner, No. 03-01-00727-CV, 2002 Tex. App. LEXIS 6296, at *10 (Tex. App.—Austin Aug. 30, 2002, no pet.)(followed)
- Boyer v. Scruggs, 806 S.W.2d 941, 944 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 1991, no pet.)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 31.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…