Summary
The Delaware Superior Court reverses, without prejudice, an Industrial Accident Board decision concerning the termination of Luis Franceschi-Rodriguez’s temporary total disability benefits. The court holds that the record established prima facie displaced-worker status based on his injury-related sedentary restrictions, Spanish-language barrier, and lack of transferable skills in the Delaware labor market. The court further concludes that the employer’s labor-market survey did not identify suitable employment within his restrictions.
Holdings
- A language barrier alone is insufficient to establish that an employee is prima facie displaced, but it is a relevant factor that must be considered together with the employee's physical injury, age, education, background, occupational experience, and the availability of suitable work.
- Franceschi-Rodriguez established prima facie displacement by proving that he was effectively an unskilled general laborer who could no longer perform general labor because of his compensable injury.
- The Board's conclusion that Franceschi-Rodriguez was not prima facie displaced was not supported by substantial evidence and had to be reversed.
- Perdue failed to establish available employment opportunities and earning capacity within Franceschi-Rodriguez's actual physical, language, and vocational restrictions.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Industrial Accident Board erred in finding that Franceschi-Rodriguez was not a prima facie displaced worker.
- Whether substantial evidence supported the Board's determination that Franceschi-Rodriguez's education and prior work experience made him employable outside general labor despite his physical restrictions and English-language barrier.
- Whether Perdue established available employment opportunities and earning capacity within Franceschi-Rodriguez's actual physical and vocational restrictions.
Disposition
reversed
Cases Cited (18)
- Foodliner v. Hidinger, 2025 WL 2795866, at *5-*6 (Del. Super. Ct. Sept. 30, 2025)(followed)
- Quality Assured Inc. v. David, 2022 WL 17442738, at *3 (Del. Super. Ct. Dec. 6, 2022)(followed)
- Stanley v. Kraft Foods, Inc., 2008 WL 2410212, at *2 (Del. Super. Ct. Mar. 24, 2008)(followed)
- Histed v. E.I. duPont de Nemours & Co., 621 A.2d 340, 342 (Del. 1993)(followed)
- Johnson v. Chrysler Corp., 213 A.2d 64, 66 (Del. 1965)(followed)
- Smith v. Allen Foods, 2026 WL 383832, at *1, *3 (Del. Super. Ct. Feb. 11, 2026)(followed)
- Miranda v. DuPont, 2000 WL 303317, at *2 (Del. Super. Ct. Feb. 29, 2000)(followed)
- Wyatt v. State, 1998 WL 283469, at *4 (Del. Super. Ct. Mar. 27, 1998)(followed)
- Hensley v. Artic Roofing, Inc., 369 A.2d 678, 679 (Del. 1976)(followed)
- Hooten v. Blue Hen Disposal, 2023 WL 1433129, at *7 (Del. Super. Ct. Feb. 1, 2023)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 18.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…