Franceschi-Rodriguez v. Perdue Foods, LLC

Franceschi-Rodriguez · Superior Court of the State of Delaware · May 22, 2026 · No. S25A-09-001 RHR

Summary

The Delaware Superior Court reverses, without prejudice, an Industrial Accident Board decision concerning the termination of Luis Franceschi-Rodriguez’s temporary total disability benefits. The court holds that the record established prima facie displaced-worker status based on his injury-related sedentary restrictions, Spanish-language barrier, and lack of transferable skills in the Delaware labor market. The court further concludes that the employer’s labor-market survey did not identify suitable employment within his restrictions.

Holdings

  1. A language barrier alone is insufficient to establish that an employee is prima facie displaced, but it is a relevant factor that must be considered together with the employee's physical injury, age, education, background, occupational experience, and the availability of suitable work.
  2. Franceschi-Rodriguez established prima facie displacement by proving that he was effectively an unskilled general laborer who could no longer perform general labor because of his compensable injury.
  3. The Board's conclusion that Franceschi-Rodriguez was not prima facie displaced was not supported by substantial evidence and had to be reversed.
  4. Perdue failed to establish available employment opportunities and earning capacity within Franceschi-Rodriguez's actual physical, language, and vocational restrictions.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the Industrial Accident Board erred in finding that Franceschi-Rodriguez was not a prima facie displaced worker.
  2. Whether substantial evidence supported the Board's determination that Franceschi-Rodriguez's education and prior work experience made him employable outside general labor despite his physical restrictions and English-language barrier.
  3. Whether Perdue established available employment opportunities and earning capacity within Franceschi-Rodriguez's actual physical and vocational restrictions.

Disposition

reversed

Cases Cited (18)

  • Foodliner v. Hidinger, 2025 WL 2795866, at *5-*6 (Del. Super. Ct. Sept. 30, 2025)(followed)
  • Quality Assured Inc. v. David, 2022 WL 17442738, at *3 (Del. Super. Ct. Dec. 6, 2022)(followed)
  • Stanley v. Kraft Foods, Inc., 2008 WL 2410212, at *2 (Del. Super. Ct. Mar. 24, 2008)(followed)
  • Histed v. E.I. duPont de Nemours & Co., 621 A.2d 340, 342 (Del. 1993)(followed)
  • Johnson v. Chrysler Corp., 213 A.2d 64, 66 (Del. 1965)(followed)
  • Smith v. Allen Foods, 2026 WL 383832, at *1, *3 (Del. Super. Ct. Feb. 11, 2026)(followed)
  • Miranda v. DuPont, 2000 WL 303317, at *2 (Del. Super. Ct. Feb. 29, 2000)(followed)
  • Wyatt v. State, 1998 WL 283469, at *4 (Del. Super. Ct. Mar. 27, 1998)(followed)
  • Hensley v. Artic Roofing, Inc., 369 A.2d 678, 679 (Del. 1976)(followed)
  • Hooten v. Blue Hen Disposal, 2023 WL 1433129, at *7 (Del. Super. Ct. Feb. 1, 2023)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 18.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…