Summary
The Delaware Supreme Court dismissed Leon K. Perkins’s appeal from an order denying his motion for appointment of counsel in connection with further post-conviction proceedings. The Court held that the order was interlocutory and not appealable in a criminal matter before entry of a final order on the post-conviction motion.
Holdings
- Under the Delaware Constitution, the Supreme Court may review only a final judgment in a criminal case; an interlocutory order is not appealable absent an applicable exception.
- The denial of a motion for appointment of counsel to pursue postconviction remedies is not appealable as a collateral order before entry of a final order on the postconviction relief motion.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Delaware Supreme Court had jurisdiction to review an interlocutory Superior Court order denying appointment of counsel in a criminal postconviction matter.
- Whether the denial of appointment of counsel was appealable as a collateral order before entry of a final order on the postconviction motion.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (9)
- Perkins v. State, 920 A.2d 391 (Del. 2007)(followed)
- State v. Perkins, 2008 WL 2406231 (Del. Super. June 11, 2008)(followed)
- State v. Perkins, 2008 WL 5191831 (Del. Dec. 11, 2008)(followed)
- State v. Cooley, 430 A.2d 789, 791 (Del. 1981)(followed)
- Lopez v. State, 2014 WL 3586494 (Del. July 21, 2014)(followed)
- Harris v. State, 2013 WL 4858990 (Del. Sept. 10, 2013)(followed)
- Brown v. State, 2012 WL 4466314 (Del. Sept. 26, 2012)(followed)
- St. Louis v. State, 2012 WL 130877 (Del. Jan. 17, 2012)(followed)
- Robinson v. State, 704 A.2d 269, 271 (Del. 1998)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…