Summary
The Delaware Supreme Court affirmed the Superior Court’s judgment revoking Vernon Speese’s probation and imposing Level IV Work Release followed by probation. The court held that SENTAC guidelines are nonbinding and that the sentence was within the authorized statutory limits and was not shown to be arbitrary or excessive.
Holdings
- The SENTAC guidelines are nonbinding and do not provide a basis for appealing a sentence that falls within the authorized statutory limits.
- After a violation of probation, the Superior Court may impose any period of incarceration up to and including the balance of the Level V time remaining on the sentence; Speese's sentence was within the authorized statutory limits and he failed to show that it was arbitrary or excessive.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Superior Court was required to sentence Speese to Level III probation under the SENTAC guidelines after finding a violation of probation.
- Whether Speese's violation-of-probation sentence was arbitrary or excessive because it exceeded the SENTAC guideline recommendation.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (2)
- Siple v. State, 701 A.2d 79, 83 (Del. 1997)(followed)
- Pavulak v. State, 880 A.2d 1044, 1046 (Del. 2005)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…