Summary
The District of Columbia Court of Appeals affirmed D.W.'s juvenile delinquency adjudication for incest. The court held that uncontradicted testimonial and circumstantial evidence was sufficient to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that D.W. and the victim were half-siblings within the statutory degree of consanguinity, and that genetic testing was not required.
Holdings
- The uncontradicted testimony identifying D.W. and D.S. as the children of the same father was sufficient to support the finding beyond a reasonable doubt that they were half-siblings and therefore related within the fourth degree of consanguinity.
- Genetic testing is not required in every incest prosecution or delinquency proceeding; testimonial or circumstantial evidence may establish consanguinity beyond a reasonable doubt.
Questions Presented
- Whether the evidence was sufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that D.W. and D.S. were related within the fourth degree of consanguinity under the District of Columbia incest statute.
- Whether scientific or genetic testing was required to establish the parties' biological relationship in a juvenile incest proceeding.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (24)
- Long v. United States, 940 A.2d 87, 99 (D.C. 2007)(followed)
- Rivas v. United States, 783 A.2d 125, 133-34 (D.C. 2001) (en banc)(followed)
- In re T.M., 577 A.2d 1149, 1151 (D.C. 1990)(followed)
- Blaize v. United States, 21 A.3d 78, 82 (D.C. 2011)(followed)
- Kaliku v. United States, 994 A.2d 765, 786 (D.C. 2010)(followed)
- Combs v. District of Columbia Dep't of Employment Servs., 983 A.2d 1004, 1010 n. 3 (D.C. 2009)(followed)
- In re S.G., 581 A.2d 771, 779 (D.C. 1990)(followed)
- Broadcast Music v. Havana Madrid Rest. Corp., 175 F.2d 77, 80 (2d Cir. 1949)(followed)
- Morris v. United States, 728 A.2d 1210, 1215 (D.C. 1999)(followed)
- Lusby v. State, 141 A.2d 893, 896 (Md. 1958)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 24.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…