Purcell v. Thomas; Thomas v. Accredited Surety and Casualty Company, Inc.

Purcell v. Thomas; Thomas v. Accredited Surety and Casualty Co., 28 A.3d 1138 (D.C. 2011) · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · September 29, 2011 · No. Nos. 09-CV-501, 10-CV-485

Summary

The District of Columbia Court of Appeals affirmed an award of attorney fees entered approximately six years after the prevailing party filed a timely fee motion following a sexual-harassment judgment. The court also held that a supersedeas bond securing the underlying judgment did not cover the later, separately entered attorney-fee award.

Holdings

  1. A prevailing party preserves its request for attorney fees by timely filing and serving the motion required by Superior Court Civil Rule 54(d)(2)(B); no additional step, such as obtaining a deferment order, requesting an immediate ruling, or appealing the lack of a ruling, is required merely because the trial court defers ruling while the merits appeal is pending.
  2. The supersedeas bond did not cover the March 2009 attorney-fee award because the bond was tied exclusively to the June 2003 judgment, which did not include attorney fees.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether a timely filed motion for attorney fees remains preserved when the trial court defers ruling on it during an appeal of the merits judgment.
  2. Whether a supersedeas bond securing a specified judgment also covers a later, separately entered award of attorney fees.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (16)

  • Purcell v. Thomas, 928 A.2d 699 (D.C. 2007)(followed)
  • Weaver v. Grafio, 595 A.2d 983, 986 (D.C. 1991)(followed)
  • Budinich v. Becton Dickinson & Co., 486 U.S. 196, 201-203 (1988)(followed)
  • District of Columbia v. Jackson, 878 A.2d 489, 492, 494 & n.5 (D.C. 2005)(followed)
  • Breiner v. Daka, Inc., 806 A.2d 180, 183 (D.C. 2002)(followed)
  • Goldberg, Marchesano, Kohlman, Inc. v. Old Republic Sur. Co., 727 A.2d 858, 860-861 (D.C. 1999)(followed)
  • May v. Cont'l Cas. Co., 936 A.2d 747, 750 (D.C. 2007)(followed)
  • Tillery v. District of Columbia Contract Appeals Bd., 912 A.2d 1169, 1176 (D.C. 2006)(followed)
  • Dyer v. Bilaal, 983 A.2d 349, 354-355 (D.C. 2009)(followed)
  • Poplar Grove Planting & Refining Co. v. Bache Halsey Stuart, Inc., 600 F.2d 1189, 1190-1191 (5th Cir. 1979)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 16.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…