Charissa Frazier v. Panera, LLC

Frazier v. Panera · District Court of Appeal of the State of Florida, Fifth District · June 30, 2023 · No. 5D22-1496

Summary

The Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal reversed a summary final judgment for Panera, LLC in a premises-liability action arising from a customer's trip over an unweighted sign base on a sidewalk. The court held that genuine issues of material fact existed regarding whether the base was open and obvious and whether Panera should have anticipated the danger. The court also emphasized that an obvious condition may discharge a duty to warn but does not eliminate the independent duty to maintain reasonably safe premises.

Holdings

  1. The evidence presented a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the weighted sign base, without an attached sign and located in the direct path of customers, was an open and obvious condition.
  2. Even if the weighted base was open and obvious, that condition would discharge only Panera's duty to warn; it would not eliminate Panera's separate and independent duty to maintain the premises in a reasonably safe condition.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether genuine issues of material fact existed as to whether the weighted sign base was an open and obvious condition.
  2. Whether, even if the base was open and obvious, Panera retained an independent duty to maintain its premises in a reasonably safe condition.
  3. Whether summary judgment was proper on Frazier's premises-liability claims.

Disposition

reversed_and_remanded

Cases Cited (6)

  • Marion v. City of Boca Raton, 47 So. 3d 334, 338 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010)(followed)
  • Burton v. MDC PGA Plaza Corp., 78 So. 3d 732, 734 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012)(followed)
  • Moultrie v. Consolidated Stores International Corp., d/b/a Big Lots Store # 505, 764 So. 2d 637 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000)(followed by analogy)
  • Pratus v. Marzucco's Constr. & Coatings, Inc., 310 So. 3d 146, 148-49 (Fla. 2d DCA 2021)(followed by analogy)
  • Marriott Int'l, Inc. v. Perez-Melendez, 855 So. 2d 624 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)(followed)
  • De Cruz-Haymer v. Festival Food Mkt., Inc., 117 So. 3d 885, 888 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…