In re Estate of Charles W. Smith, Deceased. Dale S. Wilson, et al., Petitioners/Appellants, v. Shirley I. Scruggs, Respondent/Appellee.

In re Estate of Charles W. Smith, Deceased. Dale S. Wilson, et al., Petitioners/Appellants, v. Shirley I. Scruggs, Respondent/Appellee., 685 So. 2d 1206 (Fla. 1996) (Fla. 1996) · Supreme Court of Florida · No. Nos. 84385, 84386

Summary

The Florida Supreme Court held that the four-year statute of limitations for paternity actions, § 95.11(3)(b), Fla. Stat., applies to paternity adjudications brought in probate under § 732.108(2)(b) for intestate succession, because the statute’s plain language covers all actions relating to paternity and no probate exemption exists. The court also held that applying the limitations period to bar a paternity claim for heirship does not violate equal protection or access to courts, as the claim was extinguished before any statutory amendment and a vested property right to be free from the claim accrued. The decision quashed the district court’s ruling and reinstated dismissal of the untimely claim.

Holdings

  1. Section 95.11(3)(b)'s four-year limitation applies to any action relating to determination of paternity, including those brought in probate under § 732.108(2)(b) for intestate succession, because the statute's plain language covers all such actions and no probate code provision exempts them.
  2. Application of § 95.11(3)(b) to Scruggs' paternity claim for heirship does not violate the constitution because her claim had been extinguished by a then-valid statute of limitations before any later amendment, and a vested property right to be free from the claim accrued.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Florida's four-year statute of limitations for paternity actions, § 95.11(3)(b), applies to paternity adjudications brought in probate under § 732.108(2)(b) for purposes of intestate succession.
  2. Whether applying § 95.11(3)(b) to bar a paternity claim brought for heirship violates constitutional equal protection or access to courts.

Disposition

quashed_and_remanded

Cases Cited (13)

  • In re Estate of Smith, 640 So. 2d 1152 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)(quashed)
  • King v. Estate of Anderson, 519 So. 2d 67 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988)(approved)
  • Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. West, 378 So. 2d 1220 (Fla. 1979)(distinguished)
  • Garris v. Cruce, 404 So. 2d 785 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981)(applied)
  • J.E.W. v. Estate of John Doe, 481 So. 2d 921 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985)(applied)
  • Wiley v. Roof, 641 So. 2d 66 (Fla. 1994)(followed)
  • Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Acosta, 612 So. 2d 1361 (Fla. 1992)(followed)
  • Lalli v. Lalli, 439 U.S. 259, 99 S. Ct. 518, 58 L. Ed. 2d 503 (1978)(analogized)
  • In re Estate of Odom, 397 So. 2d 420 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981)(disapproved)
  • In re Estate of Greenwood, 402 Pa. Super. 536, 587 A.2d 749 (1991)(distinguished)

Showing top 10 of 13.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…